Mini Paceman (R61)
Car comparison
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6vsNissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan Pulsar (C13)
1.6 DIG-T
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T
- Lightest1,363 kg3,005 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions138 g/km
- Best estimated range780 km484 mi
- Largest trunk385 L
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score75/100
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Fastest top speed217 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,363kg3,005lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 1,785kg3,935lb |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 78.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.6s | 7.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.4s Calculated | 39.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.2s Calculated | 7.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 174Nm/t116lb-ft/ton Calculated | 176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 734km456mi Calculated | 780km484mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,618cc99cu in |
| Length | 4,114mm162in | 4,387mm173in |
| Width | 1,786mm70in | 1,768mm70in |
| Height | 1,518mm60in | 1,520mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,700mm106in |
| Front track | 1,531mm60in | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,558mm61in | 1,530mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 156mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 385L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,080L | 1,395L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 4 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 46L |
| CO2 emissions | 148g/km | 138g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
- Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T | 5,600 rpm | 1,600-5,200 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.2 s | 7.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.6 s | 7.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.4 s | 39.8 s |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.5 s | 15.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T | 1,363 kg 3,005 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.6 s |
| NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T | 7.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 and Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T and Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 734 km 456 mi |
| NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T | 780 km 484 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.7 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
| NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
| NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6 | NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.6 s | 7.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,363 kg 3,005 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 734 km 456 mi | 780 km 484 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 148 g/km | 138 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 385 L 13.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6 | Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.20 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,680 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Paceman (R61) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T
- Is 17 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 45 km (28 mi) more estimated range
- Has 55 L more trunk volume
- Emits 10 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























