Renault Clio III (PHASE II)
Car comparison
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16VvsMini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (R56)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful201 hp150 kW
- Best power-to-weight167 hp/t124 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk288 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score59/100
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Lightest1,155 kg2,546 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range781 km485 mi
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201hp150kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 215Nm159lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,204kg2,654lb | 1,155kg2,546lb |
| Gross weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,605kg3,538lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 69.9s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.4s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 167hp/t124kW/t76hp/1000 lb Calculated | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 179Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 671km417mi Calculated | 781km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,017mm158in | 3,714mm146in |
| Width | 1,769mm70in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,484mm58in | 1,407mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,585mm102in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | 1,520mm60in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,520mm60in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 120mm5in | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 288L | 160L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,038L | 680L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 7,100 rpm | 5,400 rpm | 7,350 rpm |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.4 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 201 hp 150 kW |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V has 17 hp more than Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 and Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: 17 hp (13 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 1,204 kg 2,654 lb |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,155 kg 2,546 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 6.9 s |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V and Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 and Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 671 km 417 mi |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 781 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 201 hp 150 kW | 6.9 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.2 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V |
| 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | RenaultClio III (PHASE II)RS 2.0 16V | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp 150 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 215 Nm 159 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,204 kg 2,654 lb | 1,155 kg 2,546 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.2 L/100 km 28.7 mpg US 34.4 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 671 km 417 mi | 781 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 288 L 10.2 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 167 hp/t 124 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V | Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.35 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.09 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,230 L325 US gal271 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,153 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Renault Clio III (PHASE II) RS 2.0 16V
- Has 17 hp more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 128 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 49 kg lighter
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 111 km (69 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























