Volvo V40
Car comparison
Volvo V40 2.0 D4vsMini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (R56)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions114 g/km
- Best estimated range1,395 km867 mi
- Largest trunk496 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score95/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,165 kg2,568 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV402.0 D4 | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,379kg3,040lb | 1,165kg2,568lb |
| Gross weight | 2,020kg4,453lb | 1,615kg3,560lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 70.1s99% target: 221 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.6s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.6s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.2s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 128hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 290Nm/t194lb-ft/ton Calculated | 223Nm/t149lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,395km867mi Calculated | 781km485mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,369mm172in | 3,729mm147in |
| Width | 1,802mm71in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,445mm57in | 1,407mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,647mm104in | 2,467mm97in |
| Front track | 1,546mm61in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,536mm60in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | - | 130mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 496L | 160L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 680L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 114g/km | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V40 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 3,500 rpm | 1,750-2,750 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV402.0 D4 | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.2 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.6 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.6 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 223 km/h 139 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 144 km/h 90 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 has 7 hp more than Volvo V40 2.0 D4.
The biggest power difference is between Volvo V40 2.0 D4 and Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6: 7 hp (5 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,379 kg 3,040 lb |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,165 kg 2,568 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 223 km/h 139 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 8.6 s |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 and Volvo V40 2.0 D4: 1.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V40 2.0 D4 and Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6: 2.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 1,395 km 867 mi |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 781 km 485 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.6 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.2 s | 223 km/h 139 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV402.0 D4 | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV402.0 D4 | MiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.6 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 223 km/h 139 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,379 kg 3,040 lb | 1,165 kg 2,568 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km 36.8 mpg US 44.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,395 km 867 mi | 781 km 485 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 114 g/km | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 496 L 17.5 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 128 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V40 2.0 D4 | Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK | 6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 7.52 LC100 km | 11.20 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi | 18.02 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal | 960 L254 US gal211 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,129 LC/year | 1,680 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V40 2.0 D4
- Has 140 Nm more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 2.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 614 km (382 mi) more estimated range
- Has 336 L more trunk volume
- Emits 35 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Mini Hatch (R56) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 7 hp more
- Is 214 kg lighter
- Is 1.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























