Mini Hatch (F56)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0vsMini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Paceman (R61)
JCW 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed246 km/h153 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,220 kg2,690 lb
- Best power-to-weight189 hp/t141 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions133 g/km
- Best estimated range772 km480 mi
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score59/100
- Best economy score91/100
Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6
- Largest trunk330 L
- Best practicality score61/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 218hp163kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,220kg2,690lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,890kg4,167lb |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 66.3s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 78.2s99% target: 224 km/h / 139 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 21.9s Calculated | 32.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 189hp/t141kW/t86hp/1000 lb Calculated | 154hp/t114kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 262Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 772km480mi Calculated | 627km389mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 3,874mm153in | 4,124mm162in |
| Width | 1,727mm68in | 1,786mm70in |
| Height | 1,414mm56in | 1,518mm60in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,596mm102in |
| Front track | 1,485mm58in | 1,527mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,485mm58in | 1,554mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 128mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 211L | 330L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,080L |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | 133g/km | 175g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 5,200-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,100-4,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 21.9 s | 32.0 s |
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 218 hp 163 kW |
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 has 13 hp more than Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6 and Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 226 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 6.1 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 and Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 and Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 772 km 480 mi |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 627 km 389 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.1 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 218 hp 163 kW | 6.8 s | 226 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F56)JCW 2.0 | MiniPaceman (R61)JCW 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 218 hp 163 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 246 km/h 153 mph | 226 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 772 km 480 mi | 627 km 389 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 133 g/km | 175 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 189 hp/t 141 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 154 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0 | Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F56) JCW 2.0
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 36 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 145 km (90 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 42 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Mini Paceman (R61) JCW 1.6
- Has 119 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























