Car comparison

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 · Stage 3vsMini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 · Stage 2vsMini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 · Stage 1vsMini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison
VS
VS
VS

Mini Hatch (F56)

Cooper SD 2.0

170 hp1995 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2014-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 264 hp

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    268 km/h
    167 mph
  • Most powerful
    264 hp
    196 kW
  • Highest torque
    576 Nm
    425 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,175 kg
    2,590 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    224 hp/t
    167 kW/t
    4.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.0 L/100 km
    58.8 mpg US
    70.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    3.6 L/100 km
    65.3 mpg US
    78.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    106 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,100 km
    684 mi
  • Largest trunk
    211 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    70/100
  • Best economy score
    96/100
  • Best practicality score
    56/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)264 hpMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)230 hpMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)204 hpMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0170 hp
Power
264hp196kW+94 hp
230hp171kW+60 hp
204hp152kW+34 hp
170hp127kW
Torque
576Nm425lb-ft+216 Nm
504Nm372lb-ft+144 Nm
450Nm332lb-ft+90 Nm
360Nm266lb-ft
Curb weight
1,175kg2,590lb
1,175kg2,590lb
1,175kg2,590lb
1,175kg2,590lb
Gross weight
1,655kg3,649lb
1,655kg3,649lb
1,655kg3,649lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Top speed
268 km/h
167 mph
+41 km/h
256 km/h
159 mph
+29 km/h
246 km/h
153 mph
+19 km/h
227 km/h
141 mph
To 99% top speed
64.3s99% target: 265 km/h / 165 mph-11.7 s
Calculated
69.2s99% target: 253 km/h / 157 mph-6.9 s
Calculated
72.8s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph-3.2 s
Calculated
76.0s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.6s-1.8 s
6.1s-1.2 s
6.5s-0.8 s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
17.6s-14.2 s
Calculated
20.6s-11.1 s
Calculated
23.8s-8.0 s
Calculated
31.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.3s-1.6 s
Calculated
5.8s-1.2 s
Calculated
6.2s-0.7 s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
4L/100 km58.8mpg US70.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK
3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK
3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK
3.6L/100 km65.3mpg US78.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.5s-1.7 s
Calculated
14.1s-1.2 s
Calculated
14.5s-0.7 s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
224hp/t167kW/t102hp/1000 lb
Calculated
195hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb
Calculated
174hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
490Nm/t328lb-ft/ton
Calculated
429Nm/t287lb-ft/ton
Calculated
383Nm/t256lb-ft/ton
Calculated
306Nm/t205lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,100km684mi
Calculated
1,100km684mi
Calculated
1,100km684mi
Calculated
1,100km684mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
3,821mm150in
3,821mm150in
3,821mm150in
3,821mm150in
Width
1,727mm68in
1,727mm68in
1,727mm68in
1,727mm68in
Height
1,414mm56in
1,414mm56in
1,414mm56in
1,414mm56in
Wheelbase
2,495mm98in
2,495mm98in
2,495mm98in
2,495mm98in
Front track
1,485mm58in
1,485mm58in
1,485mm58in
1,485mm58in
Rear track
1,485mm58in
1,485mm58in
1,485mm58in
1,485mm58in
Ground clearance
143mm6in
143mm6in
143mm6in
143mm6in
Trunk volume
211L
211L
211L
211L
Doors
3
3
3
3
Seats
4
4
4
4
Fuel tank
44L
44L
44L
44L
CO2 emissions
106g/km
106g/km
106g/km
106g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 264 hpMini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2) 230 hpMini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1) 204 hpMini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 170 hpPowerTorque
  • Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 264 hp: Power / Torque
  • Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2) 230 hp: Power / Torque
  • Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1) 204 hp: Power / Torque
  • Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 170 hp: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)264 hp4,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)230 hp4,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)204 hp4,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0170 hp4,000 rpm1,500-2,750 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)264 hpMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)230 hpMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)204 hpMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0170 hp
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.3 s
5.8 s
6.2 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.6 s
6.1 s
6.5 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
17.6 s
20.6 s
23.8 s
31.8 s
Top speed
268 km/h
167 mph
256 km/h
159 mph
246 km/h
153 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.1 s
6.3 s
6.4 s
6.7 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.0 s
9.3 s
9.6 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.5 s
11.9 s
12.3 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.5 s
14.1 s
14.5 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
177 km/h
110 mph
168 km/h
105 mph
162 km/h
101 mph
152 km/h
95 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 264 hp has 94 hp more than Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 170 hp.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 170 hp and Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 264 hp: 94 hp (70 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 264 hp and Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 170 hp: 1.8 s.

The closest cars by acceleration are Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2) 230 hp and Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1) 204 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)264 hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)230 hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)204 hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0170 hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)264 hp
224 hp/t
167 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)230 hp
195 hp/t
146 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)204 hp
174 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0170 hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)264 hp
264 hp
196 kW
5.6 s
268 km/h
167 mph
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)230 hp
230 hp
171 kW
6.1 s
256 km/h
159 mph
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)204 hp
204 hp
152 kW
6.5 s
246 km/h
153 mph
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0170 hp
170 hp
127 kW
7.3 s
227 km/h
141 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)264 hp
Power
264 hp
196 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
268 km/h
167 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,821 mm
150.4 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)230 hp
Power
230 hp
171 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
256 km/h
159 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,821 mm
150.4 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)204 hp
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,821 mm
150.4 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0170 hp
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,821 mm
150.4 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)264 hp
Power
264 hp
196 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
268 km/h
167 mph
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)230 hp
Power
230 hp
171 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
256 km/h
159 mph
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)204 hp
Power
204 hp
152 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
246 km/h
153 mph
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0170 hp
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
227 km/h
141 mph
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 264 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)264 hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
5.6 s
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)230 hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
6.1 s
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)204 hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
6.5 s
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0170 hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)264 hp
224 hp/t
167 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)230 hp
195 hp/t
146 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)204 hp
174 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0170 hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)264 hpMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)230 hpMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)204 hpMiniHatch (F56)Cooper SD 2.0170 hp
Power
264 hp
196 kW
230 hp
171 kW
204 hp
152 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
576 Nm
425 lb-ft
504 Nm
372 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
360 Nm
266 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.6 s
6.1 s
6.5 s
7.3 s
Top speed
268 km/h
167 mph
256 km/h
159 mph
246 km/h
153 mph
227 km/h
141 mph
Lightness
1,175 kg
2,590 lb
1,175 kg
2,590 lb
1,175 kg
2,590 lb
1,175 kg
2,590 lb
Fuel consumption
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
4.0 L/100 km
58.8 mpg US
70.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,821 mm
150.4 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,821 mm
150.4 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,821 mm
150.4 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,821 mm
150.4 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
Range score
1,100 km
684 mi
1,100 km
684 mi
1,100 km
684 mi
1,100 km
684 mi
CO2 score
106 g/km
106 g/km
106 g/km
106 g/km
Trunk score
211 L
7.5 cu ft
211 L
7.5 cu ft
211 L
7.5 cu ft
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
224 hp/t
167 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
195 hp/t
146 kW/t
5.1 kg/hp
174 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 264 hpMini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2) 230 hpMini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1) 204 hpMini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 170 hp
Consumption4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK4 L/100 km58.8 mpg US70.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.00 LC100 km7.00 LC100 km7.00 LC100 km7.00 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi11.27 LC100 mi11.27 LC100 mi11.27 LC100 mi11.27 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used600 L159 US gal132 UK gal600 L159 US gal132 UK gal600 L159 US gal132 UK gal600 L159 US gal132 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,050 LC/year1,050 LC/year1,050 LC/year1,050 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 264 hp

  • Has 34 hp more
  • Has 72 Nm more
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 29 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare selected cars
1 vehicle selected

Popular comparisons

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 · Stage 3 vs Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 · Stage 2 vs Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 · Stage 1 vs Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper SD 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster