Volkswagen Polo V · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Volkswagen Polo V · Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSIvsMini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F56)
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lowest city consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score57/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score61/100
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0
- Lightest1,160 kg2,557 lb
- Best power-to-weight166 hp/t123 kW/t6.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions136 g/km
- Best estimated range759 km471 mi
- Largest trunk211 L
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,197kg2,639lb | 1,160kg2,557lb |
| Gross weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,640kg3,616lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.8s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 72.0s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.6s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 160hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb Calculated | 166hp/t123kW/t75hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 750km466mi Calculated | 759km471mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,983mm157in | 3,850mm152in |
| Width | 1,682mm66in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,414mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,443mm57in | 1,485mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,437mm57in | 1,485mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 204L | 211L |
| Max trunk volume | 882L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | 136g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 4,200-6,200 rpm | 1,400-4,200 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 4,700-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.6 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 192 hp 143 kW |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 1,197 kg 2,639 lb |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,160 kg 2,557 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 6.7 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI and Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 166 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 750 km 466 mi |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 759 km 471 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.7 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | 166 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,197 kg 2,639 lb | 1,160 kg 2,557 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 750 km 466 mi | 759 km 471 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | 136 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 204 L 7.2 cu ft | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 160 hp/t 120 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 166 hp/t 123 kW/t 6.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI | Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0
- Is 37 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 9 km (5 mi) more estimated range
- Has 7 L more trunk volume
- Emits 3 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























