Mini Hatch (F66)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F66) JCW 2.0vsMini Hatch (F56) · Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F56) · Facelift 2018
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F66) JCW 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.1 s
- Fastest top speed250 km/h155 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight174 hp/t130 kW/t5.8 kg/hp
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score60/100
- Best practicality score56/100
Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0
- Lightest1,175 kg2,590 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range815 km506 mi
- Largest trunk211 L
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,330kg2,932lb | 1,175kg2,590lb |
| Gross weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,655kg3,649lb |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.3s99% target: 248 km/h / 154 mph Calculated | 69.6s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.1s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 22.0s Calculated | 26.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.8s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 174hp/t130kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 286Nm/t191lb-ft/ton Calculated | 255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 647km402mi Calculated | 815km506mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,876mm153in | 3,850mm152in |
| Width | 1,744mm69in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,452mm57in | 1,414mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,499mm59in | 1,485mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,499mm59in | 1,485mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 130mm5in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 210L | 211L |
| Max trunk volume | 725L | - |
| Doors | 3 | 3 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 126g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (F66) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.8 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.1 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 22.0 s | 26.9 s |
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.3 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 166 km/h 103 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mini Hatch (F66) JCW 2.0 has 39 hp more than Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F66) JCW 2.0: 39 hp (29 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 1,175 kg 2,590 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 233 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | 6.1 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 6.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F66) JCW 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F66) JCW 2.0: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | 647 km 402 mi |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 815 km 506 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.1 s | 250 km/h 155 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.7 s | 233 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 |
| 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F66) JCW 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F66)JCW 2.0 | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.1 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 250 km/h 155 mph | 233 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | 1,175 kg 2,590 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km 43.6 mpg US 52.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 647 km 402 mi | 815 km 506 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 126 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 210 L 7.4 cu ft | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 174 hp/t 130 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 163 hp/t 122 kW/t 6.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F66) JCW 2.0 | Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK | 5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.90 LC100 km | 9.45 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi | 15.21 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal | 810 L214 US gal178 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,785 LC/year | 1,418 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F66) JCW 2.0
- Has 39 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0
- Is 155 kg lighter
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 168 km (104 mi) more estimated range
- Has 1 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























