Volkswagen Polo VI
Car comparison
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSIvsMini Hatch (F56) · Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F56) · Facelift 2018
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Largest trunk305 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best practicality score71/100
Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0
- Lightest1,220 kg2,690 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range772 km480 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 200hp149kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,280kg2,822lb | 1,220kg2,690lb |
| Gross weight | 1,780kg3,924lb | 1,635kg3,605lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.2s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 72.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.5s Calculated | 26.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 156hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 250Nm/t167lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 645km401mi Calculated | 772km480mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,067mm160in | 3,850mm152in |
| Width | 1,751mm69in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,438mm57in | 1,414mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,549mm100in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,522mm60in | 1,485mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,496mm59in | 1,485mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 305L | 211L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,079L | 731L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 40L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 4,900-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,350 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.5 s | 26.8 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI has 8 hp more than Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 and Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI: 8 hp (6 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 6.7 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 6.7 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 and Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 645 km 401 mi |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 772 km 480 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 6.7 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.7 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 200 hp 149 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,280 kg 2,822 lb | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 645 km 401 mi | 772 km 480 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 305 L 10.8 cu ft | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 156 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI | Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Polo VI GTI 2.0 TSI
- Has 8 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 94 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 127 km (79 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























