Car comparison

Volkswagen Polo V · Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSIvsMini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Polo V · Facelift 2014

GTI 1.8 TSI

192 hp1798 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2014-2017
VS

Mini Hatch (F56)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2014-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0

  • Lightest
    1,175 kg
    2,590 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    163 hp/t
    122 kW/t
    6.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    125 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    815 km
    506 mi
  • Largest trunk
    211 L
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    236 km/h
    147 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    55/100
  • Best practicality score
    61/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSIMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192hp143kW
192hp143kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
300Nm221lb-ft
Curb weight
1,197kg2,639lb
1,175kg2,590lb
Gross weight
1,710kg3,770lb
1,655kg3,649lb
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
To 99% top speed
72.3s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
69.9s99% target: 231 km/h / 143 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
6.7s
0-200 km/h
26.5s
Calculated
26.9s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.7s
Calculated
14.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
160hp/t120kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
163hp/t122kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
267Nm/t179lb-ft/ton
Calculated
255Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
750km466mi
Calculated
815km506mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,798cc110cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
3,983mm157in
3,850mm152in
Width
1,682mm66in
1,727mm68in
Height
1,450mm57in
1,414mm56in
Wheelbase
2,468mm97in
2,495mm98in
Front track
1,443mm57in
1,485mm58in
Rear track
1,437mm57in
1,485mm58in
Ground clearance
140mm6in
124mm5in
Trunk volume
204L
211L
Max trunk volume
882L
-
Doors
3
3
Seats
5
4
Fuel tank
45L
44L
CO2 emissions
139g/km
125g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSIMini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0PowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI4,200-6,200 rpm1,400-4,200 rpm6,450 rpm
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.04,700-6,000 rpm1,250-4,750 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSIMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
6.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.5 s
26.9 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
9.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.4 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.7 s
14.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
158 km/h
98 mph
158 km/h
98 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI
192 hp
143 kW
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
300 Nm
221 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI
1,197 kg
2,639 lb
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
1,175 kg
2,590 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI
236 km/h
147 mph
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
233 km/h
145 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI6.7 s
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.06.7 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 and Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI
160 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI
750 km
466 mi
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
815 km
506 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI
192 hp
143 kW
6.7 s
236 km/h
147 mph
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
6.7 s
233 km/h
145 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
204 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
3,983 mm
156.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,850 mm
151.6 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
233 km/h
145 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
6.7 s
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
6.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI
160 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSIMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
6.7 s
Top speed
236 km/h
147 mph
233 km/h
145 mph
Lightness
1,197 kg
2,639 lb
1,175 kg
2,590 lb
Fuel consumption
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
3 doors
5 seats
Trunk
204 L
7.2 cu ft
Length
3,983 mm
156.8 in
Height
1,450 mm
57.1 in
Doors/seats
3 doors
4 seats
Trunk
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
3,850 mm
151.6 in
Height
1,414 mm
55.7 in
Range score
750 km
466 mi
815 km
506 mi
CO2 score
139 g/km
125 g/km
Trunk score
204 L
7.2 cu ft
211 L
7.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
160 hp/t
120 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
163 hp/t
122 kW/t
6.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSIMini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0
Consumption6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.50 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.90 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used900 L238 US gal198 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,575 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI

  • Has 20 Nm more
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0

  • Is 22 kg lighter
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 65 km (40 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 7 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Polo V GTI 1.8 TSI
Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

GTI 1.8 TSI
GTI 2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPolo VIGTI 2.0 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
GTI 1.8 TSI
GTI 1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPolo V (3-DOOR)GTI 1.4 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
GTI 1.8 TSI
GTI 1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPolo V (5-DOOR)GTI 1.4 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
GTI 1.8 TSI
GTI 2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPolo VIFacelift 2021GTI 2.0 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6
GTI 1.8 TSI
GTI Cup 1.8
VS
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenPolo IV (9N)Facelift 2005GTI Cup 1.8
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
GTI 1.8 TSI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII (3-DOOR)GTD 2.0 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
Volkswagen Polo V · Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI vs Mini Hatch (F56) Cooper S 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster