Mini Hatch (F65)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5vsMini Hatch (F56) · Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F56) · Facelift 2018
Cooper 1.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful156 hp116 kW
- Highest torque230 Nm170 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk275 L
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5
- Lightest1,160 kg2,557 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range769 km478 mi
- Best economy score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 136hp101kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 220Nm162lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,160kg2,557lb |
| Gross weight | 1,840kg4,057lb | 1,595kg3,516lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.0s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 74.5s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.2s Calculated | 46.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 117hp/t87kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 769km478mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,499cc91cu in | 1,499cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,036mm159in | 3,821mm150in |
| Width | 1,744mm69in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,464mm58in | 1,414mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,567mm101in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | - | 1,501mm59in |
| Rear track | - | 1,501mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 143mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 275L | 211L |
| Max trunk volume | 925L | 731L |
| Doors | 5 | 3 |
| Seats | 5 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 119g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 4,900-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 1,480-4,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.2 s | 46.6 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 136 hp 101 kW |
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5 has 20 hp more than Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5 and Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 220 Nm 162 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 1,160 kg 2,557 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 210 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 8.0 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 8.0 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5 and Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 667 km 414 mi |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 769 km 478 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.0 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 136 hp 101 kW | 8.0 s | 210 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 |
| 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | MiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 136 hp 101 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 220 Nm 162 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 210 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,160 kg 2,557 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km 45.2 mpg US 54.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 769 km 478 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 119 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | 211 L 7.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 117 hp/t 87 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5 | Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 9.10 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 14.65 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 780 L206 US gal172 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,365 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 64 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Hatch (F56) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5
- Is 160 kg lighter
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 103 km (64 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























