Skoda Octavia III
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSIvsMini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F55)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lightest1,230 kg2,712 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption3.8 L/100 km61.9 mpg US74.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions112 g/km
- Best estimated range1,023 km636 mi
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score95/100
Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful180 hp134 kW
- Best power-to-weight143 hp/t107 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk590 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,260kg2,778lb | 1,230kg2,712lb |
| Gross weight | 1,840kg4,057lb | 1,755kg3,869lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 82.2s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 77.4s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.3s Calculated | 33.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 3.8L/100 km61.9mpg US74.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 293Nm/t196lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 877km545mi Calculated | 1,023km636mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,659mm183in | 4,005mm158in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,461mm58in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,567mm101in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,501mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,501mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 146mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 590L | 278L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,580L | 941L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 131g/km | 112g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 5,100-6,200 rpm | 1,250-5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.3 s | 33.3 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.0 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.9 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 94 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW |
Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI has 10 hp more than Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 7.4 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.4 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 877 km 545 mi |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,023 km 636 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.4 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 170 hp 127 kW | 7.4 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III1.8 TSI | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,260 kg 2,778 lb | 1,230 kg 2,712 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km 54.7 mpg US 65.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 877 km 545 mi | 1,023 km 636 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 131 g/km | 112 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 590 L 20.8 cu ft | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI | Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 7.52 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 12.11 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 645 L170 US gal142 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,129 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III 1.8 TSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 312 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 110 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 146 km (91 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 19 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























