Mini Hatch (F55)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0vsMini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F65)
Cooper C 1.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed232 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,220 kg2,690 lb
- Best power-to-weight157 hp/t117 kW/t6.4 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range733 km456 mi
- Largest trunk278 L
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 156hp116kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 230Nm170lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,220kg2,690lb | 1,320kg2,910lb |
| Gross weight | 1,750kg3,858lb | 1,840kg4,057lb |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 73.2s99% target: 230 km/h / 143 mph Calculated | 88.6s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.4s Calculated | 37.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 733km456mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,499cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,005mm158in | 4,036mm159in |
| Width | 1,727mm68in | 1,744mm69in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,464mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,567mm101in | 2,567mm101in |
| Front track | 1,501mm59in | - |
| Rear track | 1,501mm59in | - |
| Ground clearance | 146mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 278L | 275L |
| Max trunk volume | 941L | 925L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 4,700-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 4,900-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.4 s | 37.4 s |
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW |
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 has 36 hp more than Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5 and Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0: 36 hp (27 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.9 s |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5: 0.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 733 km 456 mi |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.9 s | 232 km/h 144 mph |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.0 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 156 hp 116 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 232 km/h 144 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 733 km 456 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 | Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
- Has 36 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 67 km (41 mi) more estimated range
- Has 3 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























