Volkswagen Polo V · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Volkswagen Polo V · Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSIvsMini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F55)
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight159 hp/t119 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best estimated range804 km499 mi
- Best performance score53/100
- Best economy score92/100
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions128 g/km
- Largest trunk278 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,205kg2,657lb | 1,240kg2,734lb |
| Gross weight | 1,710kg3,770lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.5s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 71.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.5s Calculated | 28.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.4s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 159hp/t119kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 804km499mi Calculated | 800km497mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,983mm157in | 4,005mm158in |
| Width | 1,682mm66in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,450mm57in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,468mm97in | 2,567mm101in |
| Front track | 1,443mm57in | 1,501mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,437mm57in | 1,501mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 146mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 204L | 278L |
| Max trunk volume | 882L | 941L |
| Doors | 3 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 129g/km | 128g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 5,400-6,200 rpm | 1,300-5,400 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 4,700-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.4 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.5 s | 28.4 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 192 hp 143 kW |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 6.7 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI and Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 804 km 499 mi |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 800 km 497 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.7 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI |
| 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenPolo VFacelift 2014GTI 1.8 TSI | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.6 L/100 km 42.0 mpg US 50.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 804 km 499 mi | 800 km 497 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 129 g/km | 128 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 204 L 7.2 cu ft | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 159 hp/t 119 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI | Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.6 L/100 km42 mpg US50.4 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.80 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.77 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 840 L222 US gal185 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,470 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Polo V Facelift 2014 GTI 1.8 TSI
- Is 35 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 4 km (2 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
- Has 50 Nm more
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 74 L more trunk volume
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























