Car comparison

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0vsNissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Hatch (F55)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedHatchback2014-2018
VS

Nissan Pulsar (C13)

1.6 DIG-T

190 hp1618 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedHatchback2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    230 km/h
    143 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Highest torque
    300 Nm
    221 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,240 kg
    2,734 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    155 hp/t
    115 kW/t
    6.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.0 L/100 km
    33.6 mpg US
    40.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    128 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    800 km
    497 mi
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    53/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
Power
192hp143kW
190hp142kW
Torque
300Nm221lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,240kg2,734lb
1,363kg3,005lb
Gross weight
1,770kg3,902lb
1,785kg3,935lb
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
71.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
78.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
7.7s
0-200 km/h
28.4s
Calculated
39.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.5s
Calculated
7.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.8s
Calculated
15.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton
Calculated
176Nm/t118lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
800km497mi
Calculated
780km484mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,618cc99cu in
Length
4,005mm158in
4,387mm173in
Width
1,727mm68in
1,768mm70in
Height
1,425mm56in
1,520mm60in
Wheelbase
2,567mm101in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,501mm59in
1,525mm60in
Rear track
1,501mm59in
1,530mm60in
Ground clearance
146mm6in
156mm6in
Trunk volume
278L
385L
Max trunk volume
941L
1,395L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
44L
46L
CO2 emissions
128g/km
138g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-TPowerTorque
  • Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.04,700-6,000 rpm1,250-4,750 rpm6,250 rpm
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T5,600 rpm1,600-5,200 rpm5,850 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.5 s
7.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
7.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.4 s
39.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.5 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
13.1 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.8 s
15.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
157 km/h
97 mph
147 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T.

The biggest power difference is between Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T and Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
1,240 kg
2,734 lb
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
1,363 kg
3,005 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
230 km/h
143 mph
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06.8 s
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T7.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 and Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
800 km
497 mi
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
780 km
484 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
6.8 s
230 km/h
143 mph
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
190 hp
142 kW
7.7 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Length
4,005 mm
157.7 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,387 mm
172.7 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.7 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
6.8 s
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
7.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-T
Power
192 hp
143 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
300 Nm
221 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
7.7 s
Top speed
230 km/h
143 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,240 kg
2,734 lb
1,363 kg
3,005 lb
Fuel consumption
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
278 L
9.8 cu ft
Length
4,005 mm
157.7 in
Height
1,425 mm
56.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Length
4,387 mm
172.7 in
Height
1,520 mm
59.8 in
Range score
800 km
497 mi
780 km
484 mi
CO2 score
128 g/km
138 g/km
Trunk score
278 L
9.8 cu ft
385 L
13.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
155 hp/t
115 kW/t
6.5 kg/hp
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T
Consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km9.63 LC100 km10.33 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi15.49 LC100 mi16.62 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used825 L218 US gal181 UK gal885 L234 US gal195 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,444 LC/year1,549 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 123 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 15 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 20 km (13 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 10 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T

  • Has 107 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Cooper S 2.0
1.6 DIG-T
1.6
VS
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-TvsHyundaiVelosterFacelift 20151.6
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
1.6 DIG-T
1.6 T-GDI
VS
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-TvsHyundaii30 IIFacelift 20151.6 T-GDI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0
1.6 DIG-T
2.0 TDI
VS
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-TvsSeatLeon IIIFacelift 20162.0 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (R56)Cooper S 1.6
1.6 DIG-T
Cooper S 1.6
VS
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-TvsMiniPaceman (R61)Cooper S 1.6
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F56)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
1.6 DIG-T
2.0 D4
VS
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-TvsVolvoV40Facelift 20162.0 D4
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 2.0
VS
MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2021Cooper S 2.0
1.6 DIG-T
FR 2.0 TDI
VS
NissanPulsar (C13)1.6 DIG-TvsSeatLeon III SCFacelift 2016FR 2.0 TDI
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 vs Nissan Pulsar (C13) 1.6 DIG-T - car comparison - FastVsFaster