Mini Hatch (F55) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F55) · Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0vsMini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F55)
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 7-speed
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed235 km/h146 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Lowest city consumption6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk278 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score53/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 6-speed
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,240 kg2,734 lb
- Best power-to-weight155 hp/t115 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions128 g/km
- Best estimated range800 km497 mi
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,270kg2,800lb | 1,240kg2,734lb |
| Gross weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,770kg3,902lb |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.7s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 71.2s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 27.7s Calculated | 28.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 155hp/t115kW/t70hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 220Nm/t148lb-ft/ton Calculated | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 772km480mi Calculated | 800km497mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,005mm158in | 4,005mm158in |
| Width | 1,727mm68in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,425mm56in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,567mm101in | 2,567mm101in |
| Front track | 1,485mm58in | 1,501mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,485mm58in | 1,501mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 146mm6in | 146mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 278L | 278L |
| Max trunk volume | 941L | 941L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 129g/km | 128g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 7-speed: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 6-speed: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,350-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed | 4,700-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 27.7 s | 28.4 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 97 mph | 157 km/h 97 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | 192 hp 143 kW |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed | 192 hp 143 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed | 230 km/h 143 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | 6.8 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed | 6.8 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | 772 km 480 mi |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed | 800 km 497 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.8 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed | 192 hp 143 kW | 6.8 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 6-speed is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.07-speed | MiniHatch (F55)Cooper S 2.06-speed | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 235 km/h 146 mph | 230 km/h 143 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,270 kg 2,800 lb | 1,240 kg 2,734 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 772 km 480 mi | 800 km 497 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 129 g/km | 128 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 155 hp/t 115 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 7-speed | Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 6-speed |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.98 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,496 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 7-speed
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Hatch (F55) Cooper S 2.0 6-speed
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 30 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 28 km (17 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 1 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























