Mini Hatch (F65)
Car comparison
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5vsMini Hatch (F55) · Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Hatch (F55) · Facelift 2018
Cooper 1.5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.0 s
- Fastest top speed225 km/h140 mph
- Most powerful156 hp116 kW
- Highest torque230 Nm170 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score54/100
- Best performance score46/100
- Best practicality score70/100
Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5
- Lightest1,190 kg2,624 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range727 km452 mi
- Largest trunk278 L
- Best economy score92/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156hp116kW | 136hp101kW |
| Torque | 230Nm170lb-ft | 220Nm162lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,190kg2,624lb |
| Gross weight | 1,840kg4,057lb | 1,685kg3,715lb |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.0s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated | 77.2s99% target: 205 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.0s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.2s Calculated | 54.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.6s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.8s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated | 114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 174Nm/t117lb-ft/ton Calculated | 185Nm/t124lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 667km414mi Calculated | 727km452mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,499cc91cu in | 1,499cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,036mm159in | 3,982mm157in |
| Width | 1,744mm69in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,464mm58in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,567mm101in | 2,567mm101in |
| Front track | - | 1,501mm59in |
| Rear track | - | 1,501mm59in |
| Ground clearance | - | 146mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 275L | 278L |
| Max trunk volume | 925L | 941L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 40L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 125g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5: Power / Torque
- Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 4,900-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,600 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 4,500-6,500 rpm | 1,480-4,200 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.6 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.0 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.2 s | 54.3 s |
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.3 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.3 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.8 s | 16.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW |
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 136 hp 101 kW |
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5 has 20 hp more than Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5 and Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft |
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 220 Nm 162 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 207 km/h 129 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 8.0 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 8.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5 and Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5 and Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 667 km 414 mi |
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 727 km 452 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 156 hp 116 kW | 8.0 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 136 hp 101 kW | 8.3 s | 207 km/h 129 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
| MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniHatch (F65)Cooper C 1.5 | MiniHatch (F55)Facelift 2018Cooper 1.5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp 116 kW | 136 hp 101 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 230 Nm 170 lb-ft | 220 Nm 162 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.0 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 225 km/h 140 mph | 207 km/h 129 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,190 kg 2,624 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 667 km 414 mi | 727 km 452 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 125 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 275 L 9.7 cu ft | 278 L 9.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 114 hp/t 85 kW/t 8.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5 | Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Hatch (F65) Cooper C 1.5
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mini Hatch (F55) Facelift 2018 Cooper 1.5
- Is 130 kg lighter
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 61 km (38 mi) more estimated range
- Has 3 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























