Mini Coupe (R58)
Car comparison
Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6vsSubaru BRZ I Premium 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSubaru BRZ I
Premium 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Highest torque240 Nm177 lb-ft
- Lightest1,165 kg2,568 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range862 km536 mi
- Largest trunk280 L
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score91/100
Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0
- Most powerful200 hp149 kW
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t118 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Best overall score47/100
- Best practicality score45/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 205Nm151lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,165kg2,568lb | 1,262kg2,782lb |
| Gross weight | 1,455kg3,208lb | - |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 87.5s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.9s Calculated | 37.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 206Nm/t138lb-ft/ton Calculated | 162Nm/t109lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 862km536mi Calculated | 704km438mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,734mm147in | 4,240mm167in |
| Width | 1,683mm66in | 1,775mm70in |
| Height | 1,384mm54in | 1,425mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,467mm97in | 2,570mm101in |
| Front track | 1,453mm57in | 1,520mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,461mm58in | 1,540mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 139mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 280L | 243L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
- Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 7,000 rpm | 6,400-6,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.9 s | 37.4 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.7 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW |
Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0 has 16 hp more than Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6 and Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0: 16 hp (12 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,165 kg 2,568 lb |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 1,262 kg 2,782 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 6.9 s |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 8.2 s |
Although Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0 has more power, Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6 and Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6 and Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 862 km 536 mi |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 704 km 438 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 6.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 200 hp 149 kW | 8.2 s | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCoupe (R58)Cooper S 1.6 | SubaruBRZ IPremium 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 205 Nm 151 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | Unrestricted 225 km/h140 mph Restricted 210 km/h130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,165 kg 2,568 lb | 1,262 kg 2,782 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 862 km 536 mi | 704 km 438 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 280 L 9.9 cu ft | 243 L 8.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6 | Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 12.42 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,864 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Coupe (R58) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 35 Nm more
- Is 97 kg lighter
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 158 km (98 mi) more estimated range
- Has 37 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Subaru BRZ I Premium 2.0
- Has 16 hp more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























