Mini Countryman (U25)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0vsSkoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Kodiaq II
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range879 km546 mi
- Largest trunk845 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Lightest1,640 kg3,616 lb
- Best power-to-weight124 hp/t93 kW/t8.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 193hp144kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,974kg4,352lb |
| Gross weight | 2,195kg4,839lb | - |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 88.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 8.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.2s Calculated | 43.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 98hp/t73kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 203Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 783km486mi Calculated | 879km546mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,444mm175in | 4,758mm187in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,864mm73in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,656mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | - | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | - | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 187mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 845L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 2,035L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 7 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 58L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,200 rpm | 1,750-3,250 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 8.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.2 s | 43.7 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 144 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW |
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 has 11 hp more than Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI and Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 1,974 kg 4,352 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 7.1 s |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 8.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 and Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 783 km 486 mi |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 879 km 546 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 193 hp 144 kW | 8.0 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | SkodaKodiaq II2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 193 hp 144 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 8.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,974 kg 4,352 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 783 km 486 mi | 879 km 546 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 845 L 29.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 98 hp/t 73 kW/t 10.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 | Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 334 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Kodiaq II 2.0 TDI
- Has 80 Nm more
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 96 km (60 mi) more estimated range
- Has 395 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























