Mini Countryman (R60) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (R60) · Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6vsVolkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen T-Roc I
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6
- Fastest top speed218 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score91/100
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best estimated range809 km503 mi
- Largest trunk445 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score81/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 260Nm192lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,310kg2,888lb | 1,420kg3,131lb |
| Gross weight | 1,820kg4,012lb | 1,990kg4,387lb |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.6s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated | 67.6s99% target: 214 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 36.0s Calculated | 35.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 198Nm/t133lb-ft/ton Calculated | 225Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 783km487mi Calculated | 809km503mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,109mm162in | 4,234mm167in |
| Width | 1,789mm70in | 1,819mm72in |
| Height | 1,561mm61in | 1,573mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,590mm102in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,546mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,551mm61in | 1,541mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 350L | 445L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,170L | 1,290L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 139g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 4,200-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,180 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 36.0 s | 35.7 s |
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 216 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 7.5 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI and Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6 and Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 783 km 487 mi |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 809 km 503 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.5 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | VolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 218 km/h 135 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | 1,420 kg 3,131 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.0 L/100 km 39.2 mpg US 47.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 783 km 487 mi | 809 km 503 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 139 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | 445 L 15.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6 | Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.50 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.90 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 900 L238 US gal198 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,575 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6
- Is 110 kg lighter
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen T-Roc I 2.0 TSI
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 25 km (16 mi) more estimated range
- Has 95 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























