Mini Countryman (U25)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0vsMini Countryman (R60) · Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Countryman (R60) · Facelift 2014
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best estimated range783 km486 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6
- Lightest1,335 kg2,943 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK
- Best economy score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,640kg3,616lb | 1,335kg2,943lb |
| Gross weight | 2,195kg4,839lb | 1,845kg4,068lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.8s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 72.8s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 32.2s Calculated | 40.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK | 6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.2L/100 km25.6mpg US30.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 124hp/t93kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 195Nm/t131lb-ft/ton Calculated | 195Nm/t130lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 783km486mi Calculated | 691km429mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,444mm175in | 4,109mm162in |
| Width | 1,843mm73in | 1,789mm70in |
| Height | 1,661mm65in | 1,561mm61in |
| Wheelbase | 2,692mm106in | 2,595mm102in |
| Front track | - | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | - | 1,551mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 350L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,450L | 1,170L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 54L | 47L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 157g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 32.2 s | 40.4 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 152 km/h 95 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 has 14 hp more than Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6 and Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb |
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 7.1 s |
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 7.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 and Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp |
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 783 km 486 mi |
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 691 km 429 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.8 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 |
| 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 |
| 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK |
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0 | MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,640 kg 3,616 lb | 1,335 kg 2,943 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.9 L/100 km 34.1 mpg US 40.9 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km 34.6 mpg US 41.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 783 km 486 mi | 691 km 429 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 157 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 124 hp/t 93 kW/t 8.0 kg/hp | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0 | Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.9 L/100 km34.1 mpg US40.9 mpg UK | 6.8 L/100 km34.6 mpg US41.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.08 LC100 km | 11.90 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 19.43 LC100 mi | 19.15 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,035 L273 US gal228 UK gal | 1,020 L269 US gal224 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,811 LC/year | 1,785 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (U25) S 2.0
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 60 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 91 km (57 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6
- Is 305 kg lighter
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























