Mini Countryman (R60) · Facelift 2014
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (R60) · Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6vsVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Tiguan II
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.2 L/100 km45.2 mpg US54.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions149 g/km
- Best estimated range1,053 km654 mi
- Largest trunk615 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6
- Fastest top speed213 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Lightest1,415 kg3,120 lb
- Best power-to-weight134 hp/t100 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,415kg3,120lb | 1,850kg4,079lb |
| Gross weight | 1,925kg4,244lb | 2,330kg5,137lb |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 76.6s99% target: 211 km/h / 131 mph Calculated | 79.9s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.5s Calculated | 46.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 170Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 662km411mi Calculated | 1,053km654mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,109mm162in | 4,486mm177in |
| Width | 1,789mm70in | 1,839mm72in |
| Height | 1,561mm61in | 1,673mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,595mm102in | 2,677mm105in |
| Front track | 1,525mm60in | 1,586mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,551mm61in | 1,576mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 200mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 350L | 615L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,170L | 1,655L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 47L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 165g/km | 149g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.5 s | 46.0 s |
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 90 mph | 145 km/h 90 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 8.1 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 7.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6: 1.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 662 km 411 mi |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 1,053 km 654 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.1 s | 213 km/h 132 mph |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 8.1 s |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6 | VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 213 km/h 132 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,415 kg 3,120 lb | 1,850 kg 4,079 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 662 km 411 mi | 1,053 km 654 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 165 g/km | 149 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 350 L 12.4 cu ft | 615 L 21.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 103 hp/t 77 kW/t 9.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6 | Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (R60) Facelift 2014 Cooper S 1.6
- Is 435 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
- Has 160 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 391 km (243 mi) more estimated range
- Has 265 L more trunk volume
- Emits 16 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























