Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0vsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

JCW 2.0

231 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Volvo XC60 II

2.0 D5

235 hp1969 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Most powerful
    235 hp
    175 kW
  • Highest torque
    480 Nm
    354 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.0 L/100 km
    39.2 mpg US
    47.1 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.8 L/100 km
    34.6 mpg US
    41.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    158 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,183 km
    735 mi
  • Largest trunk
    505 L
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    85/100

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    234 km/h
    145 mph
  • Lightest
    1,540 kg
    3,395 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    150 hp/t
    112 kW/t
    6.7 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    64/100
  • Best performance score
    56/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
231hp172kW
235hp175kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
480Nm354lb-ft
Curb weight
1,540kg3,395lb
1,976kg4,356lb
Gross weight
2,130kg4,696lb
2,470kg5,445lb
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
To 99% top speed
71.9s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph
Calculated
81.4s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.5s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
26.7s
Calculated
37.3s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.2s
Calculated
6.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK
6.8L/100 km34.6mpg US41.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
227Nm/t152lb-ft/ton
Calculated
243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
689km428mi
Calculated
1,183km735mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,969cc120cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,688mm185in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,902mm75in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,658mm65in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,865mm113in
Front track
1,565mm62in
1,668mm66in
Rear track
1,567mm62in
1,673mm66in
Ground clearance-
216mm9in
Trunk volume
450L
505L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
1,432L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
71L
CO2 emissions
169g/km
158g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5PowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.05,000-6,000 rpm1,450-4,500 rpm6,250 rpm
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D54,000 rpm1,750-2,250 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.2 s
6.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.5 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
26.7 s
37.3 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
6.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.5 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.3 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
159 km/h
99 mph
149 km/h
93 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
231 hp
172 kW
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 has 4 hp more than Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0.

The biggest power difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
480 Nm
354 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
1,976 kg
4,356 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
234 km/h
145 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
220 km/h
137 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.06.5 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D57.2 s

Although Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 has more power, Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 and Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
689 km
428 mi
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
1,183 km
735 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
231 hp
172 kW
6.5 s
234 km/h
145 mph
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
235 hp
175 kW
7.2 s
220 km/h
137 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
Power
231 hp
172 kW
0-100 km/h6.5 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
235 hp
175 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
220 km/h
137 mph
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.5 s
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5
Power
231 hp
172 kW
235 hp
175 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.5 s
7.2 s
Top speed
234 km/h
145 mph
220 km/h
137 mph
Lightness
1,540 kg
3,395 lb
1,976 kg
4,356 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.0 L/100 km
39.2 mpg US
47.1 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Length
4,688 mm
184.6 in
Height
1,658 mm
65.3 in
Range score
689 km
428 mi
1,183 km
735 mi
CO2 score
169 g/km
158 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
505 L
17.8 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
150 hp/t
112 kW/t
6.7 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK6 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km10.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi16.90 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal900 L238 US gal198 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year1,575 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0

  • Is 436 kg lighter
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 31 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 130 Nm more
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 494 km (307 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 55 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 11 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

JCW 2.0
JCW 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014JCW 1.6
2.0 D5
2.0 D5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC90 II2.0 D5
JCW 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 D5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsVolvoXC402.0 T5
JCW 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0 D5
2.0d
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
JCW 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 D5
Sport 2.0 T
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
JCW 2.0
25d
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)25d
2.0 D5
2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
JCW 2.0
25i
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0vsBMWX1 (F48)25i
2.0 D5
JCW 2.0
VS
VolvoXC60 II2.0 D5vsMiniCountryman (F60)JCW 2.0
Mini Countryman (F60) JCW 2.0 vs Volvo XC60 II 2.0 D5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster