Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0vsVolkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Volkswagen Tiguan II

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI

  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.5 L/100 km
    36.2 mpg US
    43.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.2 L/100 km
    45.2 mpg US
    54.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,053 km
    654 mi
  • Largest trunk
    615 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    225 km/h
    140 mph
  • Most powerful
    192 hp
    143 kW
  • Lightest
    1,430 kg
    3,153 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    134 hp/t
    100 kW/t
    7.4 kg/hp
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    144 g/km
  • Best performance score
    50/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Power
192hp143kW
190hp142kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,430kg3,153lb
1,850kg4,079lb
Gross weight
2,020kg4,453lb
2,330kg5,137lb
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
77.9s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
79.9s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.5s
7.9s
0-200 km/h
33.6s
Calculated
46.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.1s
Calculated
7.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.4s
Calculated
15.8s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb
Calculated
103hp/t77kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
196Nm/t131lb-ft/ton
Calculated
216Nm/t145lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
810km503mi
Calculated
1,053km654mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,486mm177in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,839mm72in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,673mm66in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,677mm105in
Front track
1,563mm62in
1,586mm62in
Rear track
1,565mm62in
1,576mm62in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
200mm8in
Trunk volume
450L
615L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
1,655L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
60L
CO2 emissions
144g/km
149g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.05,000-6,000 rpm1,350-4,600 rpm6,250 rpm
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,900-3,300 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.1 s
7.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.5 s
7.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
33.6 s
46.0 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
6.7 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
13.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.4 s
15.8 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
145 km/h
90 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
1,850 kg
4,079 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
225 km/h
140 mph
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.07.5 s
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI7.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 and Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
810 km
503 mi
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
1,053 km
654 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
7.5 s
225 km/h
140 mph
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
7.9 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.5 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.9 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
7.5 s
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
7.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDI
Power
192 hp
143 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.5 s
7.9 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,430 kg
3,153 lb
1,850 kg
4,079 lb
Fuel consumption
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Length
4,486 mm
176.6 in
Height
1,673 mm
65.9 in
Range score
810 km
503 mi
1,053 km
654 mi
CO2 score
144 g/km
149 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
615 L
21.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
134 hp/t
100 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
103 hp/t
77 kW/t
9.7 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
Consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km11.03 LC100 km9.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.74 LC100 mi16.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used945 L250 US gal208 UK gal855 L226 US gal188 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,654 LC/year1,496 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 420 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 13 km/h (8 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Emits 5 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 243 km (151 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 165 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0
Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IIFacelift 20202.0 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTiguan IFacelift 20112.0 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTiguan III2.0 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
S 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)S 2.0
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTiguan I2.0 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TSI
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsVolkswagenT-Roc I2.0 TSI
Cooper S 2.0
20i
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsBMWX2 (F39)20i
2.0 TDI
330TSI
VS
VolkswagenTiguan II2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTayron I330TSI
Cooper S 2.0
20d
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper S 2.0vsBMWX1 (F48)20d
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper S 2.0 vs Volkswagen Tiguan II 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster