Mini Countryman (F60)
Car comparison
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0vsSkoda Karoq · Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Karoq · Facelift 2021
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.7 s
- Highest torque360 Nm266 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.7 L/100 km50.0 mpg US60.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions124 g/km
- Best estimated range1,064 km661 mi
- Largest trunk521 L
- Best overall score56/100
- Best performance score43/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0
- Fastest top speed205 km/h127 mph
- Most powerful150 hp112 kW
- Lightest1,550 kg3,417 lb
- Best power-to-weight97 hp/t72 kW/t10.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score94/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150hp112kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,550kg3,417lb | 1,649kg3,635lb |
| Gross weight | 2,145kg4,729lb | 2,188kg4,824lb |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph Calculated | 86.9s99% target: 202 km/h / 125 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 9.0s | 8.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 67.8s Calculated | 71.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.5s Calculated | 8.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.5s Calculated | 16.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 91hp/t68kW/t41hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton Calculated | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,041km647mi Calculated | 1,064km661mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,299mm169in | 4,384mm173in |
| Width | 1,822mm72in | 1,841mm72in |
| Height | 1,557mm61in | 1,632mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,576mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,587mm62in | 1,547mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 165mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 521L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,390L | 1,630L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 130g/km | 124g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0: Power / Torque
- Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | - | 1,600-2,750 rpm | 3,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.5 s | 8.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 9.0 s | 8.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 67.8 s | 71.9 s |
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.8 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.9 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.5 s | 16.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 138 km/h 86 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW |
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb |
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 1,649 kg 3,635 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 204 km/h 127 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 9.0 s |
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 8.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 1,041 km 647 mi |
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 1,064 km 661 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 150 hp 112 kW | 9.0 s | 205 km/h 127 mph |
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.7 s | 204 km/h 127 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 9.0 s |
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
| SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0 | SkodaKaroqFacelift 20212.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp 112 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 9.0 s | 8.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 205 km/h 127 mph | 204 km/h 127 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,550 kg 3,417 lb | 1,649 kg 3,635 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,041 km 647 mi | 1,064 km 661 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 130 g/km | 124 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 521 L 18.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 91 hp/t 68 kW/t 11.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 | Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.58 LC100 km | 8.23 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,286 LC/year | 1,234 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0
- Is 99 kg lighter
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Skoda Karoq Facelift 2021 2.0 TDI
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 23 km (14 mi) more estimated range
- Has 71 L more trunk volume
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























