Car comparison

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0vsSkoda Karoq 1.5 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mini Countryman (F60)

Cooper D 2.0

150 hp1995 ccDieselAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2018-2020
VS

Skoda Karoq

1.5 TSI

150 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2021

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0

  • Fastest top speed
    205 km/h
    127 mph
  • Most powerful
    150 hp
    112 kW
  • Highest torque
    350 Nm
    258 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.9 L/100 km
    48.0 mpg US
    57.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,041 km
    647 mi
  • Best performance score
    42/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.6 s
  • Lightest
    1,318 kg
    2,906 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    114 hp/t
    85 kW/t
    8.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    125 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    521 L
  • Best overall score
    55/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
Power
150hp112kW
150hp112kW
Torque
350Nm258lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,550kg3,417lb
1,318kg2,906lb
Gross weight
2,145kg4,729lb
1,929kg4,253lb
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
To 99% top speed
87.3s99% target: 203 km/h / 126 mph
Calculated
81.5s99% target: 201 km/h / 125 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
9.0s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
67.8s
Calculated
73.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.5s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.5s
Calculated
16.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb
Calculated
114hp/t85kW/t52hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
226Nm/t151lb-ft/ton
Calculated
190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,041km647mi
Calculated
909km565mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,995cc122cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,299mm169in
4,382mm173in
Width
1,822mm72in
1,841mm72in
Height
1,557mm61in
1,603mm63in
Wheelbase
2,670mm105in
2,638mm104in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,576mm62in
Rear track
1,587mm62in
1,541mm61in
Ground clearance
165mm6in
-
Trunk volume
450L
521L
Max trunk volume
1,390L
1,630L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
51L
50L
CO2 emissions
130g/km
125g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSIPowerTorque
  • Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0: Power / Torque
  • Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.04,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI5,000-6,000 rpm1,500-3,500 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.5 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
9.0 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
67.8 s
73.5 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.8 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.9 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.5 s
16.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
138 km/h
86 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
150 hp
112 kW
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
1,550 kg
3,417 lb
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
1,318 kg
2,906 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
205 km/h
127 mph
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
203 km/h
126 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.09.0 s
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI8.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI and Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 and Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
1,041 km
647 mi
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
909 km
565 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
150 hp
112 kW
9.0 s
205 km/h
127 mph
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
150 hp
112 kW
8.6 s
203 km/h
126 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
521 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,382 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,603 mm
63.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h9.0 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
203 km/h
126 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
9.0 s
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0SkodaKaroq1.5 TSI
Power
150 hp
112 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
9.0 s
8.6 s
Top speed
205 km/h
127 mph
203 km/h
126 mph
Lightness
1,550 kg
3,417 lb
1,318 kg
2,906 lb
Fuel consumption
4.9 L/100 km
48.0 mpg US
57.6 mpg UK
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,299 mm
169.3 in
Height
1,557 mm
61.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
521 L
18.4 cu ft
Length
4,382 mm
172.5 in
Height
1,603 mm
63.1 in
Range score
1,041 km
647 mi
909 km
565 mi
CO2 score
130 g/km
125 g/km
Trunk score
450 L
15.9 cu ft
521 L
18.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
97 hp/t
72 kW/t
10.3 kg/hp
114 hp/t
85 kW/t
8.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI
Consumption4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.58 LC100 km9.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.80 LC100 mi15.49 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used735 L194 US gal162 UK gal825 L218 US gal181 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,286 LC/year1,444 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0

  • Has 100 Nm more
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 132 km (82 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI

  • Is 232 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 17 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 71 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 5 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0
Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cooper D 2.0
Cooper D 2.0
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (F60)Facelift 2020Cooper D 2.0
1.5 TSI
35 TFSI
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsAUDIQ235 TFSI
Cooper D 2.0
C 1.5
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (U25)C 1.5
1.5 TSI
280TSI
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenTacqua280TSI
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Facelift 2014Cooper S 1.6
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Roc I1.5 TSI
Cooper D 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0vsMiniCountryman (R60)Cooper S 1.6
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsVolkswagenT-Cross1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI
Cooper D 2.0
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsMiniCountryman (F60)Cooper D 2.0
1.5 TSI
35 TFSI
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsAUDIQ2L35 TFSI
1.5 TSI
2.0 SKYACTIV-G
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsMazdaCX-3Facelift 20182.0 SKYACTIV-G
1.5 TSI
2.0 e-Skyactiv G
VS
SkodaKaroq1.5 TSIvsMazdaCX-302.0 e-Skyactiv G
Mini Countryman (F60) Cooper D 2.0 vs Skoda Karoq 1.5 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster