Mini Convertible (F57)
Car comparison
Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0vsMini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Convertible (F67)
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed242 km/h150 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Lightest1,235 kg2,723 lb
- Best power-to-weight187 hp/t139 kW/t5.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range677 km421 mi
- Largest trunk160 L
- Best overall score51/100
- Best performance score56/100
- Best economy score89/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,235kg2,723lb | 1,380kg3,042lb |
| Gross weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,805kg3,979lb |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 83.2s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 91.6s99% target: 235 km/h / 146 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 6.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.7s Calculated | 30.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 187hp/t139kW/t85hp/1000 lb Calculated | 148hp/t110kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated | 217Nm/t145lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 677km421mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,874mm153in | 3,879mm153in |
| Width | 1,727mm68in | 1,744mm69in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,431mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,485mm58in | 1,499mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,485mm58in | 1,499mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 115mm5in | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 160L |
| Max trunk volume | 215L | 215L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 152g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 5,200-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,800 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,450-4,500 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 6.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.7 s | 30.4 s |
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 12.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 157 km/h 98 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW |
Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0 has 27 hp more than Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 1,235 kg 2,723 lb |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 237 km/h 147 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 6.6 s |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0 and Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 677 km 421 mi |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.6 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.9 s | 237 km/h 147 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 |
| 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniConvertible (F57)JCW 2.0 | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 6.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 242 km/h 150 mph | 237 km/h 147 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,235 kg 2,723 lb | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.5 L/100 km 36.2 mpg US 43.5 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 677 km 421 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 152 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 187 hp/t 139 kW/t 5.3 kg/hp | 148 hp/t 110 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0 | Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.5 L/100 km36.2 mpg US43.5 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.38 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.31 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 975 L258 US gal214 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,706 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Convertible (F57) JCW 2.0
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 145 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 10 km (6 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper S 2.0
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























