Mini Convertible (F57) · Facelift 2018
Car comparison
Mini Convertible (F57) · Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0vsMini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Convertible (F67)
Cooper C 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Convertible (F57) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful192 hp143 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,295 kg2,855 lb
- Best power-to-weight148 hp/t111 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range759 km471 mi
- Largest trunk160 L
- Best overall score47/100
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192hp143kW | 163hp122kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,295kg2,855lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 1,765kg3,891lb | 1,805kg3,979lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 86.9s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 100.7s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.1s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.7s Calculated | 44.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.7s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.1s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 148hp/t111kW/t67hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t88kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 182Nm/t122lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 759km471mi Calculated | 667km414mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,850mm152in | 3,879mm153in |
| Width | 1,727mm68in | 1,744mm69in |
| Height | 1,415mm56in | 1,431mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,485mm58in | 1,499mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,485mm58in | 1,499mm59in |
| Ground clearance | 115mm5in | 124mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 160L |
| Max trunk volume | 215L | 215L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | 134g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Convertible (F57) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 5,000-6,500 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.7 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.1 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.7 s | 44.9 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.7 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.1 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 151 km/h 94 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 163 hp 122 kW |
Mini Convertible (F57) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 has 29 hp more than Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0 and Mini Convertible (F57) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0: 29 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 7.1 s |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 8.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Convertible (F57) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Convertible (F57) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 759 km 471 mi |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 667 km 414 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 163 hp 122 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 |
| 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Convertible (F57) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniConvertible (F57)Facelift 2018Cooper S 2.0 | MiniConvertible (F67)Cooper C 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp 143 kW | 163 hp 122 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.1 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,295 kg 2,855 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 759 km 471 mi | 667 km 414 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 134 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 148 hp/t 111 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Convertible (F57) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0 | Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.15 LC100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,523 LC/year | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Convertible (F57) Facelift 2018 Cooper S 2.0
- Has 29 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 80 kg lighter
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 92 km (57 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Mini Convertible (F67) Cooper C 2.0
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























