Mini Convertible (F67)
Car comparison
Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0vsMini Convertible (F57) Cooper S 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Convertible (F57)
Cooper S 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.4 s
- Fastest top speed245 km/h152 mph
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight162 hp/t121 kW/t6.2 kg/hp
- Largest trunk160 L
- Best overall score52/100
- Best performance score58/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper S 2.0
- Lightest1,220 kg2,690 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range759 km471 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231hp172kW | 192hp143kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,220kg2,690lb |
| Gross weight | 1,845kg4,068lb | 1,765kg3,891lb |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 87.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph Calculated | 85.1s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.4s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.3s Calculated | 33.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.1s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.5s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 162hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb Calculated | 157hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 267Nm/t178lb-ft/ton Calculated | 230Nm/t154lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 620km385mi Calculated | 759km471mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,879mm153in | 3,850mm152in |
| Width | 1,744mm69in | 1,727mm68in |
| Height | 1,431mm56in | 1,415mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,495mm98in | 2,495mm98in |
| Front track | 1,499mm59in | 1,485mm58in |
| Rear track | 1,499mm59in | 1,485mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 115mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 160L | 160L |
| Max trunk volume | 215L | 215L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 44L | 44L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 134g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0: Power / Torque
- Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,250-4,600 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.1 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.4 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.3 s | 33.2 s |
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.2 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.4 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.2 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.5 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW |
Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0 has 39 hp more than Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper S 2.0.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0: 39 hp (29 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 | 228 km/h 142 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 6.4 s |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0 and Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper S 2.0: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper S 2.0 and Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0: 1.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 620 km 385 mi |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 | 759 km 471 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 231 hp 172 kW | 6.4 s | 245 km/h 152 mph |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 | 192 hp 143 kW | 7.1 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 |
| 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK |
| MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniConvertible (F67)JCW 2.0 | MiniConvertible (F57)Cooper S 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 hp 172 kW | 192 hp 143 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.4 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 245 km/h 152 mph | 228 km/h 142 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | 1,220 kg 2,690 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.1 L/100 km 33.1 mpg US 39.8 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 620 km 385 mi | 759 km 471 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 134 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | 160 L 5.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 162 hp/t 121 kW/t 6.2 kg/hp | 157 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0 | Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper S 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.42 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.00 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,065 L281 US gal234 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,864 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Convertible (F67) JCW 2.0
- Has 39 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Mini Convertible (F57) Cooper S 2.0
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 139 km (86 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























