Mini Clubman (R55)
Car comparison
Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6vsSeat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSeat Exeo ST
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.8 s
- Fastest top speed238 km/h148 mph
- Most powerful211 hp157 kW
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight175 hp/t131 kW/t5.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best economy score87/100
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
- Best estimated range886 km551 mi
- Largest trunk442 L
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 211hp157kW | 200hp149kW |
| Torque | 280Nm207lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,205kg2,657lb | 1,490kg3,285lb |
| Gross weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.4s99% target: 236 km/h / 146 mph Calculated | 73.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.8s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 23.8s Calculated | 28.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.5s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK | 7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.7s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 175hp/t131kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated | 134hp/t100kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 188Nm/t126lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 694km432mi Calculated | 886km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 3,958mm156in | 4,670mm184in |
| Width | 1,683mm66in | 1,772mm70in |
| Height | 1,432mm56in | 1,430mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,547mm100in | 2,642mm104in |
| Front track | 1,453mm57in | 1,522mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,461mm58in | 1,523mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 442L |
| Max trunk volume | 930L | 1,354L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 167g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6: Power / Torque
- Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,000-5,300 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 5,700 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.8 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 23.8 s | 28.5 s |
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.5 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.7 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 163 km/h 101 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | 211 hp 157 kW |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW |
Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6 has 11 hp more than Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI and Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6: 11 hp (8 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 235 km/h 146 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | 6.8 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6 and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6 and Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | 694 km 432 mi |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 886 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | 211 hp 157 kW | 6.8 s | 238 km/h 148 mph |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 200 hp 149 kW | 7.6 s | 235 km/h 146 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 |
| 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI |
| 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK |
| SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniClubman (R55)JCW 1.6 | SeatExeo ST2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 211 hp 157 kW | 200 hp 149 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.8 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 238 km/h 148 mph | 235 km/h 146 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | 1,490 kg 3,285 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.2 L/100 km 32.7 mpg US 39.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km 29.8 mpg US 35.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 694 km 432 mi | 886 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 167 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 442 L 15.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 175 hp/t 131 kW/t 5.7 kg/hp | 134 hp/t 100 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6 | Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.2 L/100 km32.7 mpg US39.2 mpg UK | 7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.60 LC100 km | 13.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.28 LC100 mi | 22.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,080 L285 US gal238 UK gal | 1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,890 LC/year | 2,074 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Clubman (R55) JCW 1.6
- Has 11 hp more
- Is 285 kg lighter
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 41 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Seat Exeo ST 2.0 TSI
- Has 192 km (119 mi) more estimated range
- Has 182 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























