Skoda Octavia III Combi
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSIvsMini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (R55)
Cooper S 1.6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Highest torque260 Nm192 lb-ft
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
- Best estimated range847 km527 mi
- Best economy score91/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.4 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 184hp137kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 260Nm192lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,267kg2,793lb | 1,205kg2,657lb |
| Gross weight | 1,852kg4,083lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 65.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.9s Calculated | 29.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 820km509mi Calculated | 847km527mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,659mm183in | 3,961mm156in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,683mm66in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,432mm56in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,547mm100in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,453mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,512mm60in | 1,461mm58in |
| Ground clearance | 140mm6in | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 260L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 930L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 50L |
| CO2 emissions | 141g/km | 137g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 5,100-6,200 rpm | 1,250-5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.9 s | 29.3 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 155 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 has 4 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI and Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 1,267 kg 2,793 lb |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 7.4 s |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.5 s |
Although Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 has more power, Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI and Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 820 km 509 mi |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 847 km 527 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.5 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 184 hp 137 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,267 kg 2,793 lb | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 820 km 509 mi | 847 km 527 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 141 g/km | 137 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI | Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Has 350 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 4 hp more
- Has 10 Nm more
- Is 62 kg lighter
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 28 km (17 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 4 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























