Mini Clubman (R55)
Car comparison
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6vsSkoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonSkoda Octavia III Combi
1.8 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.5 s
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Most powerful184 hp137 kW
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions137 g/km
- Best estimated range847 km527 mi
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score91/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI
- Highest torque280 Nm207 lb-ft
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 180hp134kW |
| Torque | 260Nm192lb-ft | 280Nm207lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,205kg2,657lb | 1,375kg3,031lb |
| Gross weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 2,013kg4,438lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 69.5s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.3s Calculated | 30.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 7.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 204Nm/t136lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 847km527mi Calculated | 821km510mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,798cc110cu in |
| Length | 3,961mm156in | 4,659mm183in |
| Width | 1,683mm66in | 1,814mm71in |
| Height | 1,432mm56in | 1,465mm58in |
| Wheelbase | 2,547mm100in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,453mm57in | 1,543mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,461mm58in | 1,512mm60in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 140mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 610L |
| Max trunk volume | 930L | 1,740L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | 156g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
- Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 4,500-6,200 rpm | 1,350-4,500 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.3 s | 30.3 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 13.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 has 4 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI and Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 227 km/h 141 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.5 s |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 7.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 and Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI: 0.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 847 km 527 mi |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 821 km 510 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.5 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.5 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 180 hp 134 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | 280 Nm 207 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 227 km/h 141 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | 1,375 kg 3,031 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 847 km 527 mi | 821 km 510 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | 156 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 | Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 11.73 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,759 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 170 kg lighter
- Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 22 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 27 km (17 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 19 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 350 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























