Volvo V90
Car comparison
Volvo V90 2.0 D4vsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.6 s
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions119 g/km
- Best performance score51/100
- Best economy score95/100
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph Unrestricted220 km/h137 mph Restricted
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption4.2 L/100 km56.0 mpg US67.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,170 km727 mi
- Largest trunk560 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolvoV902.0 D4 | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,882kg4,149lb | 1,450kg3,197lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,025kg4,464lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 71.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 7.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.5s Calculated | 31.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.1s Calculated | 7.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.7L/100 km50mpg US60.1mpg UK | 4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.6L/100 km42mpg US50.4mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK | 4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 15.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 101hp/t75kW/t46hp/1000 lb Calculated | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 213Nm/t142lb-ft/ton Calculated | 248Nm/t166lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,170km727mi Calculated | 1,067km663mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,969cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,936mm194in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,879mm74in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,475mm58in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,941mm116in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,628mm64in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 153mm6in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 560L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,526L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 124g/km | 119g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volvo V90 2.0 D4: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4,250 rpm | 1,740-2,520 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolvoV902.0 D4 | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.1 s | 7.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 7.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.5 s | 31.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.7 s | 13.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 15.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 146 km/h 91 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 8.5 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Volvo V90 2.0 D4: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 1,170 km 727 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,067 km 663 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.5 s | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.6 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 |
| 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | 7.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolvoV902.0 D4 | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolvoV902.0 D4 | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 7.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 230 km/h143 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,882 kg 4,149 lb | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.7 L/100 km 50.0 mpg US 60.1 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km 52.3 mpg US 62.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,170 km 727 mi | 1,067 km 663 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 124 g/km | 119 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 560 L 19.8 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 101 hp/t 75 kW/t 9.9 kg/hp | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volvo V90 2.0 D4 | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.7 L/100 km50 mpg US60.1 mpg UK | 4.5 L/100 km52.3 mpg US62.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.23 LC100 km | 7.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.24 LC100 mi | 12.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 705 L186 US gal155 UK gal | 675 L178 US gal148 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,234 LC/year | 1,181 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volvo V90 2.0 D4
- Has 40 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 104 km (64 mi) more estimated range
- Has 200 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Is 432 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 30 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 5 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























