Mini Clubman (F54)
Car comparison
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 · Stage 3vsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 · Stage 2vsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 · Stage 1vsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)
Mini Clubman (F54)
Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)
Mini Clubman (F54)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 295 hp
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.6 s
- Fastest top speed258 km/h160 mph
- Most powerful295 hp220 kW
- Highest torque576 Nm425 lb-ft
- Lightest1,510 kg3,329 lb
- Best power-to-weight195 hp/t145 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.3 L/100 km54.7 mpg US65.7 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions127 g/km
- Best estimated range1,000 km621 mi
- Largest trunk360 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score68/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295hp220kW+105 hp | 257hp191kW+67 hp | 228hp170kW+38 hp | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 576Nm425lb-ft+216 Nm | 504Nm372lb-ft+144 Nm | 450Nm332lb-ft+90 Nm | 360Nm266lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,510kg3,329lb | 1,510kg3,329lb |
| Gross weight | 2,085kg4,597lb | 2,085kg4,597lb | 2,085kg4,597lb | 2,085kg4,597lb |
| Top speed | 258 km/h 160 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 57.4s99% target: 255 km/h / 159 mph-11.5 s Calculated | 61.4s99% target: 244 km/h / 151 mph-7.5 s Calculated | 64.3s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph-4.6 s Calculated | 68.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.6s-1.8 s | 6.1s-1.3 s | 6.6s-0.8 s | 7.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.8s-14.6 s Calculated | 21.1s-11.3 s Calculated | 24.6s-7.8 s Calculated | 32.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s-1.7 s Calculated | 5.9s-1.2 s Calculated | 6.3s-0.7 s Calculated | 7.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK | 4.3L/100 km54.7mpg US65.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.6s-1.7 s Calculated | 14.2s-1.2 s Calculated | 14.6s-0.7 s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 195hp/t145kW/t88hp/1000 lb Calculated | 170hp/t127kW/t77hp/1000 lb Calculated | 151hp/t113kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated | 126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 381Nm/t255lb-ft/ton Calculated | 334Nm/t223lb-ft/ton Calculated | 298Nm/t199lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,253mm167in | 4,253mm167in | 4,253mm167in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,800mm71in | 1,800mm71in | 1,800mm71in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,441mm57in | 1,441mm57in | 1,441mm57in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,559mm61in | 1,559mm61in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,561mm61in | 1,561mm61in | 1,561mm61in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | 141mm6in | 141mm6in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 360L | 360L | 360L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,250L | 1,250L | 1,250L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 48L | 48L | 48L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 127g/km | 127g/km | 127g/km | 127g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 295 hp: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2) 257 hp: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1) 228 hp: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 190 hp: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp | 4,000 rpm | 1,500-2,750 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.9 s | 6.3 s | 7.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.6 s | 6.1 s | 6.6 s | 7.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.8 s | 21.1 s | 24.6 s | 32.4 s |
| Top speed | 258 km/h 160 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.5 s | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.3 s | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 9.4 s | 9.7 s | 10.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.5 s | 12.0 s | 12.4 s | 12.9 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.6 s | 14.2 s | 14.6 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 110 mph | 168 km/h 104 mph | 162 km/h 101 mph | 153 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | 257 hp 191 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | 228 hp 170 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 295 hp has 105 hp more than Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 190 hp.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 190 hp and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 295 hp: 105 hp (78 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | 576 Nm 425 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | 504 Nm 372 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | 5.6 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | 6.1 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | 6.6 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp | 7.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 295 hp and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 190 hp: 1.8 s.
The closest cars by acceleration are Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2) 257 hp and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1) 228 hp, separated by only 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | 1,000 km 621 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | 295 hp 220 kW | 5.6 s | 258 km/h 160 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | 257 hp 191 kW | 6.1 s | 246 km/h 153 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | 228 hp 170 kW | 6.6 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.4 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 295 hp is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.1 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.6 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3)295 hp | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2)257 hp | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1)228 hp | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0190 hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 295 hp 220 kW | 257 hp 191 kW | 228 hp 170 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 576 Nm 425 lb-ft | 504 Nm 372 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 360 Nm 266 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.6 s | 6.1 s | 6.6 s | 7.4 s | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 258 km/h 160 mph | 246 km/h 153 mph | 236 km/h 147 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | 1,510 kg 3,329 lb | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 127 g/km | 127 g/km | 127 g/km | 127 g/km | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 195 hp/t 145 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 170 hp/t 127 kW/t 5.9 kg/hp | 151 hp/t 113 kW/t 6.6 kg/hp | 126 hp/t 94 kW/t 7.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 295 hp | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2) 257 hp | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 1) 228 hp | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 190 hp |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 8.40 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year | 1,260 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 3) 295 hp
- Has 38 hp more
- Has 72 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 25 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 (Stage 2) 257 hp
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























