Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017
Car comparison
Skoda Octavia III Combi · Facelift 2017 1.8 TSIvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions129 g/km
- Best estimated range980 km609 mi
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Lightest1,267 kg2,793 lb
- Best power-to-weight142 hp/t106 kW/t7.0 kg/hp
- Largest trunk610 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best practicality score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 180hp134kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,267kg2,793lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | 1,852kg4,083lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.7s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 66.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.4s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.9s Calculated | 31.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.0s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 820km509mi Calculated | 980km609mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,798cc110cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,667mm184in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,814mm71in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,465mm58in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,680mm106in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,543mm61in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,540mm61in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 141mm6in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 610L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,740L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 140g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | 5,100-6,200 rpm | 1,250-5,000 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.4 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.9 s | 31.4 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 has 10 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | 1,267 kg 2,793 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | 7.4 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | 820 km 509 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 980 km 609 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | 180 hp 134 kW | 7.4 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI |
| 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 7.4 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SkodaOctavia III CombiFacelift 20171.8 TSI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 180 hp 134 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.4 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,267 kg 2,793 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.1 L/100 km 38.6 mpg US 46.3 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 820 km 509 mi | 980 km 609 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 140 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 610 L 21.5 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.67 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.18 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 915 L242 US gal201 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,601 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Skoda Octavia III Combi Facelift 2017 1.8 TSI
- Is 198 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 12 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 250 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 160 km (99 mi) more estimated range
- Emits 11 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























