Seat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Seat Leon III ST · Facelift 2016 2.0 TDIvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Fastest top speed228 km/h142 mph
- Lightest1,340 kg2,954 lb
- Best power-to-weight137 hp/t102 kW/t7.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions121 g/km
- Best estimated range1,087 km675 mi
- Largest trunk587 L
- Best overall score63/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Best performance score52/100
Specification comparison
| Model | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 380Nm280lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,340kg2,954lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | 1,970kg4,343lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.1s99% target: 226 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 66.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.8s Calculated | 31.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 284Nm/t190lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,087km675mi Calculated | 980km609mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,549mm179in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,816mm71in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,454mm57in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,636mm104in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,538mm61in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,508mm59in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 587L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 121g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 3,500-4,000 rpm | 1,750-3,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.8 s | 31.4 s |
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 153 km/h 95 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 has 6 hp more than Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 7.8 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 1,087 km 675 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 980 km 609 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.8 s | 228 km/h 142 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI |
| 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 228 km/h 142 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,340 kg 2,954 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.6 L/100 km 51.1 mpg US 61.4 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,087 km 675 mi | 980 km 609 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 121 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 587 L 20.7 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 137 hp/t 102 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.05 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 12.96 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 690 L182 US gal152 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,208 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Seat Leon III ST Facelift 2016 2.0 TDI
- Is 125 kg lighter
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 107 km (67 mi) more estimated range
- Has 227 L more trunk volume
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























