Mini Clubman (R55)
Car comparison
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6vsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMini Clubman (F54)
Cooper SD 2.0
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.2 s
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.9 L/100 km48.0 mpg US57.6 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions129 g/km
- Best estimated range980 km609 mi
- Largest trunk360 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score52/100
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score78/100
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Fastest top speed227 km/h141 mph
- Lightest1,205 kg2,657 lb
- Best power-to-weight153 hp/t114 kW/t6.5 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 184hp137kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 260Nm192lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,205kg2,657lb | 1,465kg3,230lb |
| Gross weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 2,055kg4,530lb |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.8s99% target: 225 km/h / 140 mph Calculated | 66.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 29.3s Calculated | 31.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK | 4.9L/100 km48mpg US57.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 130hp/t97kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 216Nm/t144lb-ft/ton Calculated | 273Nm/t183lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 847km527mi Calculated | 980km609mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,995cc122cu in |
| Length | 3,961mm156in | 4,253mm167in |
| Width | 1,683mm66in | 1,800mm71in |
| Height | 1,432mm56in | 1,441mm57in |
| Wheelbase | 2,547mm100in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,453mm57in | 1,560mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,461mm58in | 1,561mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | 141mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | 930L | 1,250L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 50L | 48L |
| CO2 emissions | 137g/km | 129g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: Power / Torque
- Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5,500 rpm | 1,700-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4,000 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 29.3 s | 31.4 s |
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 6.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 96 mph | 154 km/h 96 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 has 6 hp more than Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6.
The biggest power difference is between Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0: 6 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 7.5 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 7.2 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 and Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 847 km 527 mi |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 980 km 609 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 184 hp 137 kW | 7.5 s | 227 km/h 141 mph |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.2 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 |
| 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | 7.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
| MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6 | MiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 184 hp 137 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 260 Nm 192 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 227 km/h 141 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,205 kg 2,657 lb | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km 48.0 mpg US 57.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 847 km 527 mi | 980 km 609 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 137 g/km | 129 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 130 hp/t 97 kW/t 7.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6 | Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK | 4.9 L/100 km48 mpg US57.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.33 LC100 km | 8.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi | 13.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal | 735 L194 US gal162 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,549 LC/year | 1,286 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mini Clubman (R55) Cooper S 1.6
- Is 260 kg lighter
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 23 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper SD 2.0
- Has 6 hp more
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 132 km (82 mi) more estimated range
- Has 100 L more trunk volume
- Emits 8 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























