Car comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDIvsMini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Superb III Combi

2.0 TDI

190 hp1968 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2019
VS

Mini Clubman (F54)

Cooper S 2.0

192 hp1998 ccGasolineAWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2016-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI

  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,500 km
    932 mi
  • Largest trunk
    660 L
  • Best overall score
    63/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    95/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
Power
190hp142kW
192hp143kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
280Nm207lb-ft
Curb weight
1,505kg3,318lb
1,450kg3,197lb
Gross weight
2,170kg4,784lb
2,030kg4,475lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
81.2s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
66.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.1s
7.0s
0-200 km/h
31.1s
Calculated
29.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.7s
Calculated
6.7s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
3.9L/100 km60.3mpg US72.4mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
15.8s
Calculated
15.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
126hp/t94kW/t57hp/1000 lb
Calculated
132hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
266Nm/t178lb-ft/ton
Calculated
193Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,500km932mi
Calculated
686km426mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,968cc120cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,856mm191in
4,253mm167in
Width
1,864mm73in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,477mm58in
1,441mm57in
Wheelbase
2,841mm112in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,584mm62in
1,560mm61in
Rear track
1,572mm62in
1,561mm61in
Ground clearance
149mm6in
141mm6in
Trunk volume
660L
360L
Max trunk volume
1,950L
1,250L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
48L
CO2 emissions-
162g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDIMini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0PowerTorque
  • Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.05,000 rpm1,250 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.7 s
6.7 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.1 s
7.0 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
31.1 s
29.5 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.8 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
12.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.8 s
15.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
156 km/h
97 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 has 2 hp more than Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
280 Nm
207 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
1,450 kg
3,197 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
235 km/h
146 mph
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI8.1 s
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.07.0 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 and Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI: 1.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI and Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
1,500 km
932 mi
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
686 km
426 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
190 hp
142 kW
8.1 s
235 km/h
146 mph
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
192 hp
143 kW
7.0 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,856 mm
191.2 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h8.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
Power
192 hp
143 kW
0-100 km/h7.0 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
8.1 s
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
7.0 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDI
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIMiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0
Power
190 hp
142 kW
192 hp
143 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.1 s
7.0 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
1,450 kg
3,197 lb
Fuel consumption
4.4 L/100 km
53.5 mpg US
64.2 mpg UK
7.0 L/100 km
33.6 mpg US
40.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
660 L
23.3 cu ft
Length
4,856 mm
191.2 in
Height
1,477 mm
58.1 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Range score
1,500 km
932 mi
686 km
426 mi
CO2 score
-
162 g/km
Trunk score
660 L
23.3 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
126 hp/t
94 kW/t
7.9 kg/hp
132 hp/t
99 kW/t
7.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDIMini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0
Consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km7.70 LC100 km12.25 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi12.39 LC100 mi19.71 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used660 L174 US gal145 UK gal1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,155 LC/year1,838 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI

  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 814 km (506 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 300 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest

Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Is 55 kg lighter
  • Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI
Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0vsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
2.0 TDI
1.8 TFSI ultra
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0vsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
Cooper S 2.0
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0vsSeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
Cooper SD 2.0
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsMiniClubman (F54)Cooper SD 2.0
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
520d
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsBMW5 Series Touring (G31)520d
Cooper S 2.0
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
MiniClubman (F54)Cooper S 2.0vsRenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe
2.0 TDI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantFacelift 2017GTD 2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsVolkswagenGolf VII AlltrackFacelift 20171.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
1.8 TFSI
VS
SkodaSuperb III Combi2.0 TDIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20141.8 TFSI
Skoda Superb III Combi 2.0 TDI vs Mini Clubman (F54) Cooper S 2.0 - car comparison - FastVsFaster