Car comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSIvsMini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Skoda Octavia III Combi

1.8 TSI

180 hp1798 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2013-2017
VS

Mini Clubman (F54)

2.0d

190 hp1995 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedWagon / estate2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

  • Most powerful
    190 hp
    142 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.6 L/100 km
    51.1 mpg US
    61.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.4 L/100 km
    43.6 mpg US
    52.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.2 L/100 km
    56.0 mpg US
    67.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    122 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,043 km
    648 mi
  • Best performance score
    52/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    229 km/h
    142 mph
  • Lightest
    1,267 kg
    2,793 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    142 hp/t
    106 kW/t
    7.0 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    610 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best practicality score
    88/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelSkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
180hp134kW
190hp142kW
Torque
250Nm184lb-ft
400Nm295lb-ft
Curb weight
1,267kg2,793lb
1,385kg3,053lb
Gross weight
1,852kg4,083lb
1,960kg4,321lb
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
To 99% top speed
67.8s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph
Calculated
68.3s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.4s
7.4s
0-200 km/h
28.9s
Calculated
30.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.0s
Calculated
7.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.1L/100 km38.6mpg US46.3mpg UK
4.6L/100 km51.1mpg US61.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
4.2L/100 km56mpg US67.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.3s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
137hp/t102kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
197Nm/t132lb-ft/ton
Calculated
289Nm/t193lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
820km509mi
Calculated
1,043km648mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,798cc110cu in
1,995cc122cu in
Length
4,659mm183in
4,253mm167in
Width
1,814mm71in
1,800mm71in
Height
1,465mm58in
1,441mm57in
Wheelbase
2,680mm106in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,543mm61in
1,560mm61in
Rear track
1,512mm60in
1,561mm61in
Ground clearance
140mm6in
141mm6in
Trunk volume
610L
360L
Max trunk volume
1,740L
1,250L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
50L
48L
CO2 emissions
141g/km
122g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSIMini Clubman (F54) 2.0dPowerTorque
  • Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI5,100-6,200 rpm1,250-5,000 rpm6,450 rpm
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d4,000 rpm1,750-2,500 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricSkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.0 s
7.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.4 s
7.4 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
28.9 s
30.7 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.1 s
10.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.0 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.3 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
155 km/h
97 mph
154 km/h
96 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
190 hp
142 kW

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d has 10 hp more than Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI and Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
400 Nm
295 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
1,267 kg
2,793 lb
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
1,385 kg
3,053 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
229 km/h
142 mph
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
225 km/h
140 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI7.4 s
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d7.4 s

Although Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d has more power, Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d and Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI: 1.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
820 km
509 mi
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
1,043 km
648 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
180 hp
134 kW
7.4 s
229 km/h
142 mph
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
190 hp
142 kW
7.4 s
225 km/h
140 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,659 mm
183.4 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
Power
180 hp
134 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
190 hp
142 kW
0-100 km/h7.4 s
Top speed
225 km/h
140 mph
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
7.4 s
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
7.4 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSI
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
MiniClubman (F54)2.0d
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleSkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Power
180 hp
134 kW
190 hp
142 kW
Torque
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.4 s
7.4 s
Top speed
229 km/h
142 mph
225 km/h
140 mph
Lightness
1,267 kg
2,793 lb
1,385 kg
3,053 lb
Fuel consumption
6.1 L/100 km
38.6 mpg US
46.3 mpg UK
4.6 L/100 km
51.1 mpg US
61.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
610 L
21.5 cu ft
Length
4,659 mm
183.4 in
Height
1,465 mm
57.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,253 mm
167.4 in
Height
1,441 mm
56.7 in
Range score
820 km
509 mi
1,043 km
648 mi
CO2 score
141 g/km
122 g/km
Trunk score
610 L
21.5 cu ft
360 L
12.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
137 hp/t
102 kW/t
7.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleSkoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSIMini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
Consumption6.1 L/100 km38.6 mpg US46.3 mpg UK4.6 L/100 km51.1 mpg US61.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.67 LC100 km8.05 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.18 LC100 mi12.96 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used915 L242 US gal201 UK gal690 L182 US gal152 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,601 LC/year1,208 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI

  • Is 118 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 250 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 224 km (139 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 19 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI
Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIvsSeatLeon III ST1.8 TSI
2.0d
Cooper S 1.6
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsMiniClubman (R55)Cooper S 1.6
1.8 TSI
GTD 2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII VariantGTD 2.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B8)2.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIvsVolkswagenGolf VII Alltrack2.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsSeatLeon X-Perience2.0 TDI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsVolkswagenPassat Alltrack (B8)2.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
1.8 TFSI
VS
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20141.8 TFSI
2.0d
2.0 TDI
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsSeatLeon III STFacelift 20162.0 TDI
2.0d
1.8 TFSI ultra
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsAUDIA6 Avant (4G/C7)Facelift 20161.8 TFSI ultra
2.0d
GT 1.6 Energy TCe
VS
MiniClubman (F54)2.0dvsRenaultMegane IV GrandtourGT 1.6 Energy TCe
1.8 TSI
2.0d
VS
SkodaOctavia III Combi1.8 TSIvsMiniClubman (F54)2.0d
Skoda Octavia III Combi 1.8 TSI vs Mini Clubman (F54) 2.0d - car comparison - FastVsFaster