Car comparison

MG ZT-T 4.6 V8vsVolvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

MG ZT-T

4.6 V8

260 hp4601 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedWagon / estate2003-2005
VS

Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004

2.4i 20V T5

260 hp2401 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedWagon / estate2005-2007

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

MG ZT-T 4.6 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    260 hp
    194 kW
  • Highest torque
    410 Nm
    302 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,600 kg
    3,527 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    163 hp/t
    121 kW/t
    6.2 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    60/100

Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.0 L/100 km
    23.5 mpg US
    28.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    14.6 L/100 km
    16.1 mpg US
    19.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.6 L/100 km
    30.9 mpg US
    37.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    239 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    700 km
    435 mi
  • Largest trunk
    485 L
  • Best economy score
    80/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMGZT-T4.6 V8VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
Power
260hp194kW
260hp194kW
Torque
410Nm302lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,600kg3,527lb
1,625kg3,583lb
Gross weight-
2,150kg4,740lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
245 km/h
152 mph
To 99% top speed
73.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
73.5s99% target: 243 km/h / 151 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.7s
7.2s
0-200 km/h
21.7s
Calculated
25.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
17.9L/100 km13.1mpg US15.8mpg UK
14.6L/100 km16.1mpg US19.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.6s
Calculated
15.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
163hp/t121kW/t74hp/1000 lb
Calculated
160hp/t119kW/t73hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
256Nm/t171lb-ft/ton
Calculated
215Nm/t144lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
500km311mi
Calculated
700km435mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,601cc281cu in
2,401cc147cu in
Length
4,790mm189in
4,710mm185in
Width
1,850mm73in
1,804mm71in
Height
1,430mm56in
1,514mm60in
Wheelbase
2,746mm108in
2,755mm108in
Front track
1,560mm61in
1,563mm62in
Rear track
1,610mm63in
1,560mm61in
Trunk volume
400L
485L
Max trunk volume
1,220L
1,641L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
66L
70L
CO2 emissions
314g/km
239g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

MG ZT-T 4.6 V8Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5PowerTorque
  • MG ZT-T 4.6 V8: Power / Torque
  • Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
MGZT-T4.6 V85,250 rpm4,000 rpm6,000 rpm
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T55,500 rpm2,100 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMGZT-T4.6 V8VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.7 s
7.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
21.7 s
25.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
245 km/h
152 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.6 s
6.8 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.4 s
12.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.6 s
15.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
165 km/h
103 mph
159 km/h
99 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V8
260 hp
194 kW
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
260 hp
194 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V8
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V8
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
1,625 kg
3,583 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V8
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
245 km/h
152 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V86.7 s
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T57.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between MG ZT-T 4.6 V8 and Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V8
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5 and MG ZT-T 4.6 V8: 3.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V8
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
MGZT-T4.6 V8
500 km
311 mi
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
700 km
435 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
MGZT-T4.6 V8
260 hp
194 kW
6.7 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
260 hp
194 kW
7.2 s
245 km/h
152 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
MGZT-T4.6 V8
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
400 L
14.1 cu ft
Length
4,790 mm
188.6 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,514 mm
59.6 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
MGZT-T4.6 V8
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h6.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
Power
260 hp
194 kW
0-100 km/h7.2 s
Top speed
245 km/h
152 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
MGZT-T4.6 V8
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
6.7 s
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
7.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
MGZT-T4.6 V8
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMGZT-T4.6 V8VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
Power
260 hp
194 kW
260 hp
194 kW
Torque
410 Nm
302 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.7 s
7.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
245 km/h
152 mph
Lightness
1,600 kg
3,527 lb
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
Fuel consumption
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
400 L
14.1 cu ft
Length
4,790 mm
188.6 in
Height
1,430 mm
56.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Length
4,710 mm
185.4 in
Height
1,514 mm
59.6 in
Range score
500 km
311 mi
700 km
435 mi
CO2 score
314 g/km
239 g/km
Trunk score
400 L
14.1 cu ft
485 L
17.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
163 hp/t
121 kW/t
6.2 kg/hp
160 hp/t
119 kW/t
6.3 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMG ZT-T 4.6 V8Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5
Consumption13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km23.10 LC100 km17.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi37.18 LC100 mi28.16 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,465 LC/year2,625 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

MG ZT-T 4.6 V8

  • Has 60 Nm more
  • Is 25 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 15 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 3 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volvo V70 II Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5

  • Uses 3.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 200 km (124 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 85 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 75 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
MG ZT-T 4.6 V8
Volvo V70 II 2.4i 20V T5
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.6 V8
2.4i 20V T5
VS
MGZT-T4.6 V8vsVolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5
2.4i 20V T5
R 2.5i V20
VS
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5vsVolvoV70 IIR 2.5i V20
4.6 V8
330xi
VS
MGZT-T4.6 V8vsBMW3 Series Touring (E91)330xi
2.4i 20V T5
2.0 T5
VS
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5vsVolvoV70 III2.0 T5
4.6 V8
330i
VS
MGZT-T4.6 V8vsBMW3 Series Touring (E46)Facelift 2001330i
2.4i 20V T5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5vsVolvoV502.5 T5
4.6 V8
3.2 FSI V6
VS
MGZT-T4.6 V8vsAUDIA6 Avant (4F/C6)3.2 FSI V6
2.4i 20V T5
2.5 T5
VS
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5vsVolvoV50Facelift 20072.5 T5
4.6 V8
4.0 W8 32V
VS
MGZT-T4.6 V8vsVolkswagenPassat Variant (B5.5)4.0 W8 32V
2.4i 20V T5
3.0 T6
VS
VolvoV70 IIFacelift 20042.4i 20V T5vsVolvoXC70 II3.0 T6
4.6 V8
2.7 T V6
VS
MGZT-T4.6 V8vsAUDIA6 Avant (4B/C5)Facelift 20012.7 T V6
4.6 V8
535d
VS
MGZT-T4.6 V8vsBMW5 Series Touring (E61)535d
MG ZT-T 4.6 V8 vs Volvo V70 II · Facelift 2004 2.4i 20V T5 - car comparison - FastVsFaster