Volkswagen Golf III Variant
Car comparison
Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 SyncrovsMercedes-Benz S124 · Facelift 1989 300 TE-24
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz S124 · Facelift 1989
300 TE-24
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.1 s
- Fastest top speed222 km/h138 mph
- Lightest1,380 kg3,042 lb
- Lowest highway consumption8.2 L/100 km28.7 mpg US34.4 mpg UK
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score78/100
Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 300 TE-24
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque265 Nm195 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight138 hp/t103 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption15.5 L/100 km15.2 mpg US18.2 mpg UK
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score89/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 220hp164kW |
| Torque | 245Nm181lb-ft | 265Nm195lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,380kg3,042lb | 1,590kg3,505lb |
| Gross weight | 1,860kg4,101lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 71.8s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated | 77.9s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.1s | 8.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 34.4s Calculated | 36.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 7.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.6L/100 km22.2mpg US26.6mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 16.1L/100 km14.6mpg US17.5mpg UK | 15.5L/100 km15.2mpg US18.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.2L/100 km28.7mpg US34.4mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 138hp/t103kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated | 138hp/t103kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated | 167Nm/t112lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 613km381mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,861cc175cu in | 2,960cc181cu in |
| Length | 4,340mm171in | 4,765mm188in |
| Width | 1,695mm67in | 1,740mm69in |
| Height | 1,430mm56in | 1,489mm59in |
| Wheelbase | 2,475mm97in | 2,800mm110in |
| Front track | 1,478mm58in | 1,497mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,465mm58in | 1,497mm59in |
| Trunk volume | 466L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 1,425L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 72L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 300 TE-24: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 5,800 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 6,400 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 7.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.1 s | 8.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 34.4 s | 36.6 s |
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.8 s | 2.8 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.1 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 147 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 190 hp 142 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 220 hp 164 kW |
Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 300 TE-24 has 30 hp more than Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro and Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 300 TE-24: 30 hp (22 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 222 km/h 138 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 8.1 s |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 8.3 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 300 TE-24 has more power, Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro and Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 300 TE-24: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.1 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | 220 hp 164 kW | 8.3 s | 222 km/h 138 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenGolf III Variant2.9 VR6 Syncro | Mercedes-BenzS124Facelift 1989300 TE-24 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 220 hp 164 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 245 Nm 181 lb-ft | 265 Nm 195 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.1 s | 8.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 222 km/h 138 mph | 222 km/h 138 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,380 kg 3,042 lb | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.6 L/100 km 22.2 mpg US 26.6 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 613 km 381 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 466 L 16.5 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.3 kg/hp | 138 hp/t 103 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.6 L/100 km22.2 mpg US26.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.85 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,590 L420 US gal350 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,783 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Golf III Variant 2.9 VR6 Syncro
- Is 210 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz S124 Facelift 1989 300 TE-24
- Has 30 hp more
- Has 20 Nm more
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























