Morgan Plus Four
Car comparison
Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower TurbovsMercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
SLK 300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted240 km/h149 mph Restricted
- Most powerful258 hp192 kW
- Lightest1,013 kg2,233 lb
- Best power-to-weight255 hp/t190 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score55/100
- Best performance score66/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best economy score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 258hp192kW | 245hp183kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 370Nm273lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,013kg2,233lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,820kg4,012lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 57.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 74.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.2s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.9s Calculated | 20.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.0s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.3L/100 km32.2mpg US38.7mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 5.2L/100 km45.2mpg US54.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.2s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 255hp/t190kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated | 171hp/t128kW/t78hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 346Nm/t231lb-ft/ton Calculated | 259Nm/t173lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 968km601mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 3,830mm151in | 4,134mm163in |
| Width | 1,650mm65in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,250mm49in | 1,301mm51in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | - | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | - | 1,565mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 225L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 335L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 165g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.0 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.2 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.9 s | 20.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.8 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.2 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.2 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 111 mph | 169 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 258 hp 192 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 245 hp 183 kW |
Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300 and Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 1,013 kg 2,233 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 5.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300 and Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 258 hp 192 kW | 5.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 245 hp 183 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo |
| 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 5.2 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 258 hp 192 kW | 245 hp 183 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.2 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,013 kg 2,233 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.3 L/100 km 32.2 mpg US 38.7 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 968 km 601 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 165 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 255 hp/t 190 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 171 hp/t 128 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.3 L/100 km32.2 mpg US38.7 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.78 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.56 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,095 L289 US gal241 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,916 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo
- Has 13 hp more
- Is 417 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 83 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 300
- Has 20 Nm more
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
Pros
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























