Porsche Boxster (986)
Car comparison
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2vsMercedes-Benz SLK (R171) SLK 350 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R171)
SLK 350 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) SLK 350 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.5 s
- Most powerful272 hp203 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption14.2 L/100 km16.6 mpg US19.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range693 km431 mi
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score80/100
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Fastest top speed264 km/h164 mph
- Lightest1,320 kg2,910 lb
- Best power-to-weight197 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk260 L
- Best overall score53/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 260hp194kW | 272hp203kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 350Nm258lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,320kg2,910lb | 1,390kg3,064lb |
| Gross weight | 1,630kg3,594lb | 1,780kg3,924lb |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 72.5s99% target: 261 km/h / 162 mph Calculated | 69.2s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.7s | 5.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.4s Calculated | 19.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.4s Calculated | 5.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 10.1L/100 km23.3mpg US28.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 15.3L/100 km15.4mpg US18.5mpg UK | 14.2L/100 km16.6mpg US19.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.8s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 196hp/t146kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 235Nm/t157lb-ft/ton Calculated | 252Nm/t168lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 610km379mi Calculated | 693km431mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,179cc194cu in | 3,498cc213cu in |
| Length | 4,320mm170in | 4,089mm161in |
| Width | 1,780mm70in | 1,788mm70in |
| Height | 1,290mm51in | 1,298mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,415mm95in | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | 1,455mm57in | 1,526mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,514mm60in | 1,549mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 260L | 208L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 64L | 70L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) SLK 350 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 6,200 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 6,450 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 | 6,000 rpm | 2,400-5,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.4 s | 5.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.4 s | 19.1 s |
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.1 s | 8.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.6 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.8 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 106 mph | 172 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 hp 194 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 | 272 hp 203 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) SLK 350 V6 has 12 hp more than Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2.
The biggest power difference is between Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) SLK 350 V6: 12 hp (9 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 5.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 | 5.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) SLK 350 V6 and Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 610 km 379 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 | 693 km 431 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 260 hp 194 kW | 5.7 s | 264 km/h 164 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 | 272 hp 203 kW | 5.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 |
| 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 |
| 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) SLK 350 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | 5.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheBoxster (986)S 3.2 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)SLK 350 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 260 hp 194 kW | 272 hp 203 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.7 s | 5.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 264 km/h 164 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,320 kg 2,910 lb | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km 23.3 mpg US 28.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 610 km 379 mi | 693 km 431 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 260 L 9.2 cu ft | 208 L 7.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 196 hp/t 146 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2 | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) SLK 350 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK | 10.1 L/100 km23.3 mpg US28 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km | 17.68 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi | 28.45 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal | 1,515 L400 US gal333 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year | 2,651 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Boxster (986) S 3.2
- Is 70 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 52 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) SLK 350 V6
- Has 12 hp more
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 84 km (52 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























