Mercedes-Benz SL (R232)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43vsMercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
AMG SLK 55 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.6 s
- Highest torque540 Nm398 lb-ft
- Lightest1,535 kg3,384 lb
- Best power-to-weight274 hp/t205 kW/t3.6 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.4 L/100 km28.0 mpg US33.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range833 km518 mi
- Largest trunk225 L
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score84/100
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43
- Fastest top speed278 km/h173 mph
- Most powerful421 hp314 kW
- Best overall score65/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 421hp314kW | 421hp314kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 540Nm398lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,735kg3,825lb | 1,535kg3,384lb |
| Gross weight | 2,185kg4,817lb | 1,910kg4,211lb |
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.9s99% target: 275 km/h / 171 mph Calculated | 58.1s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 4.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated | 274hp/t205kW/t124hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton Calculated | 352Nm/t235lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 737km458mi Calculated | 833km518mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 5,461cc333cu in |
| Length | 4,700mm185in | 4,134mm163in |
| Width | 1,915mm75in | 1,810mm71in |
| Height | 1,359mm54in | 1,301mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,430mm96in |
| Front track | 1,665mm66in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,629mm64in | 1,565mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 213L | 225L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 335L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 195g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 6,750 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 6,800 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 4.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 15.0 s |
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.6 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 421 hp 314 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 421 hp 314 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 4.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43: 1.1 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 737 km 458 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 833 km 518 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 421 hp 314 kW | 4.7 s | 278 km/h 173 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 421 hp 314 kW | 4.6 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 |
| 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 4.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43 | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)AMG SLK 55 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 421 hp 314 kW | 421 hp 314 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 4.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 278 km/h 173 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,735 kg 3,825 lb | 1,535 kg 3,384 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.5 L/100 km 24.8 mpg US 29.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 737 km 458 mi | 833 km 518 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 195 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 213 L 7.5 cu ft | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 274 hp/t 205 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43 | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.63 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.76 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,425 L376 US gal313 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,494 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 43
- Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) AMG SLK 55 V8
- Has 40 Nm more
- Is 200 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.1 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 96 km (60 mi) more estimated range
- Has 12 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























