Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) · Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6vsMorgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMorgan Plus Four
2.0 TwinPower Turbo
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful367 hp274 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best practicality score35/100
Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Lightest1,009 kg2,224 lb
- Best power-to-weight256 hp/t191 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Best economy score88/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 258hp192kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,009kg2,224lb |
| Gross weight | 2,115kg4,663lb | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 66.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 52.5s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.5s Calculated | 15.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.6s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 12.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 256hp/t191kW/t116hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 396Nm/t265lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 872km542mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,631mm182in | 3,830mm151in |
| Width | 1,877mm74in | 1,650mm65in |
| Height | 1,315mm52in | 1,250mm49in |
| Wheelbase | 2,585mm102in | - |
| Front track | 1,600mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | - |
| Trunk volume | 364L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 485L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 75L | - |
| CO2 emissions | - | 159g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.6 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.5 s | 15.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 12.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 179 km/h 112 mph | 183 km/h 114 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 258 hp 192 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 has 109 hp more than Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo.
The biggest power difference is between Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo and Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6: 109 hp (81 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 1,009 kg 2,224 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 4.9 s |
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 4.8 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 has more power, Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo and Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo and Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6: 1.6 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 367 hp 274 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 258 hp 192 kW | 4.8 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 |
| 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | ||||||
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo |
| 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK |
| MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | MorganPlus Four2.0 TwinPower Turbo | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 258 hp 192 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 240 km/h149 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,009 kg 2,224 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.6 L/100 km 27.4 mpg US 32.8 mpg UK | 7.0 L/100 km 33.6 mpg US 40.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 872 km 542 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 159 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 364 L 12.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 256 hp/t 191 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 | Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK | 7 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.05 LC100 km | 12.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 24.22 LC100 mi | 19.71 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal | 1,050 L277 US gal231 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,258 LC/year | 1,838 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6
- Has 109 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Morgan Plus Four 2.0 TwinPower Turbo
- Is 651 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























