Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) · Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6vsMercedes-Benz SLK (R170) · Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) · Facelift 2016

SL 400 V6

367 hp2996 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticTwin-turboRoadster2019-2020
VS

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) · Facelift 2000

AMG SLK 32 V6

354 hp3199 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedRoadster2001-2004

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.9 s
  • Fastest top speed
    270 km/h
    168 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    367 hp
    274 kW
  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    8.6 L/100 km
    27.4 mpg US
    32.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.1 L/100 km
    33.1 mpg US
    39.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    872 km
    542 mi
  • Largest trunk
    364 L
  • Best overall score
    61/100
  • Best performance score
    73/100
  • Best economy score
    84/100
  • Best practicality score
    35/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
Power
367hp274kW
354hp264kW
Torque
500Nm369lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,660kg3,660lb
1,420kg3,131lb
Gross weight
2,115kg4,663lb
1,755kg3,869lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
66.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
64.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.9s
5.2s
0-200 km/h
16.5s
Calculated
16.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.7s
Calculated
5.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.0s
Calculated
13.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb
Calculated
249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton
Calculated
317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
872km542mi
Calculated
536km333mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,996cc183cu in
3,199cc195cu in
Length
4,631mm182in
4,010mm158in
Width
1,877mm74in
1,715mm68in
Height
1,315mm52in
1,269mm50in
Wheelbase
2,585mm102in
2,400mm94in
Front track
1,600mm63in
1,488mm59in
Rear track
1,604mm63in
1,477mm58in
Trunk volume
364L
145L
Max trunk volume
485L
348L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
75L
60L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V65,500-6,000 rpm2,000-4,200 rpm6,300 rpm
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V66,100 rpm4,400 rpm6,350 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.7 s
5.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.9 s
5.2 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.5 s
16.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
5.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.5 s
8.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.9 s
11.2 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.0 s
13.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
179 km/h
112 mph
179 km/h
111 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6
367 hp
274 kW
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
354 hp
264 kW

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 has 13 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6: 13 hp (10 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
1,420 kg
3,131 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V64.9 s
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V65.2 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6: 0.3 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6: 2.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6
872 km
542 mi
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
536 km
333 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6
367 hp
274 kW
4.9 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
354 hp
264 kW
5.2 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
364 L
12.9 cu ft
Length
4,631 mm
182.3 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
Power
354 hp
264 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
145 L
5.1 cu ft
Length
4,010 mm
157.9 in
Height
1,269 mm
50.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
0-100 km/h4.9 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
Power
354 hp
264 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
4.9 s
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
5.2 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
Power
367 hp
274 kW
354 hp
264 kW
Torque
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.9 s
5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
Fuel consumption
8.6 L/100 km
27.4 mpg US
32.8 mpg UK
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
364 L
12.9 cu ft
Length
4,631 mm
182.3 in
Height
1,315 mm
51.8 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
145 L
5.1 cu ft
Length
4,010 mm
157.9 in
Height
1,269 mm
50.0 in
Range score
872 km
542 mi
536 km
333 mi
Trunk score
364 L
12.9 cu ft
145 L
5.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
221 hp/t
165 kW/t
4.5 kg/hp
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6
Consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.05 LC100 km19.60 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.22 LC100 mi31.54 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,290 L341 US gal284 UK gal1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,258 LC/year2,940 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6

  • Has 13 hp more
  • Has 50 Nm more
  • Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 336 km (209 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 219 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) SL 400 V6
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) AMG SLK 32 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

SL 400 V6
AMG SL 43
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6vsMercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43
AMG SLK 32 V6
AMG SLK 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8
SL 400 V6
AMG SL 60 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6vsMercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8
AMG SLK 32 V6
AMG SLK 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8
SL 400 V6
SL 600 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6vsMercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
AMG SLK 32 V6
SLK 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 350 V6
SL 400 V6
AMG SL 63
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6vsMercedes-BenzSL (R231)AMG SL 63
AMG SLK 32 V6
SLK 230 Kompressor
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
SL 400 V6
AMG SL 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6vsMercedes-BenzSL (R230)AMG SL 55 V8
AMG SLK 32 V6
5.7 i V8 16V
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6vsChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V
SL 400 V6
SL 600 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6vsMercedes-BenzSL (R230)Facelift 2008SL 600 V12
SL 400 V6
SL 600 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6vsMercedes-BenzSL (R230)Facelift 2006SL 600 V12
Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) · Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 vs Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) · Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster