Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) · Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6vsMercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) · Facelift 2000

AMG SLK 32 V6

354 hp3199 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticSuperchargedRoadster2001-2004
VS

Mercedes-Benz SL (R129)

SL 600 V12

394 hp5987 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedRoadster1993-1995

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    5.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    270 km/h
    168 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,420 kg
    3,131 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    249 hp/t
    186 kW/t
    4.0 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    16.2 L/100 km
    14.5 mpg US
    17.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    8.4 L/100 km
    28.0 mpg US
    33.6 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    71/100
  • Best economy score
    77/100

Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12

  • Most powerful
    394 hp
    294 kW
  • Highest torque
    570 Nm
    420 lb-ft
  • Best estimated range
    606 km
    377 mi
  • Largest trunk
    265 L
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best practicality score
    31/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
Power
354hp264kW
394hp294kW
Torque
450Nm332lb-ft
570Nm420lb-ft
Curb weight
1,420kg3,131lb
1,980kg4,365lb
Gross weight
1,755kg3,869lb
2,320kg5,115lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
64.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
86.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
5.2s
6.1s
0-200 km/h
16.8s
Calculated
21.0s
Calculated
0-60 mph
5.0s
Calculated
5.8s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
13.2L/100 km17.8mpg US21.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK
20.2L/100 km11.6mpg US14.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Quarter mile
13.2s
Calculated
14.1s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
249hp/t186kW/t113hp/1000 lb
Calculated
199hp/t148kW/t90hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
317Nm/t212lb-ft/ton
Calculated
288Nm/t193lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
536km333mi
Calculated
606km377mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,199cc195cu in
5,987cc365cu in
Length
4,010mm158in
4,470mm176in
Width
1,715mm68in
1,812mm71in
Height
1,269mm50in
1,296mm51in
Wheelbase
2,400mm94in
2,515mm99in
Front track
1,488mm59in
1,532mm60in
Rear track
1,477mm58in
1,521mm60in
Trunk volume
145L
265L
Max trunk volume
348L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
60L
80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V66,100 rpm4,400 rpm6,350 rpm
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V125,200 rpm3,800 rpm5,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
5.0 s
5.8 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
5.2 s
6.1 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
16.8 s
21.0 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.3 s
2.4 s
330 ft
101 m
5.9 s
6.2 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.7 s
9.3 s
1000 ft
305 m
11.2 s
11.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
13.2 s
14.1 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
179 km/h
111 mph
167 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
354 hp
264 kW
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
394 hp
294 kW

Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12 has 40 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12: 40 hp (30 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
570 Nm
420 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
1,980 kg
4,365 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V65.2 s
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V126.1 s

Although Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12 has more power, Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12: 2.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
199 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
536 km
333 mi
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
606 km
377 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
354 hp
264 kW
5.2 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
394 hp
294 kW
6.1 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
Power
354 hp
264 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
145 L
5.1 cu ft
Length
4,010 mm
157.9 in
Height
1,269 mm
50.0 in
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
Power
394 hp
294 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
265 L
9.4 cu ft
Length
4,470 mm
176.0 in
Height
1,296 mm
51.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
Power
354 hp
264 kW
0-100 km/h5.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
Power
394 hp
294 kW
0-100 km/h6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
5.2 s
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
6.1 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
199 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12
Power
354 hp
264 kW
394 hp
294 kW
Torque
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
570 Nm
420 lb-ft
Acceleration
5.2 s
6.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,420 kg
3,131 lb
1,980 kg
4,365 lb
Fuel consumption
11.2 L/100 km
21.0 mpg US
25.2 mpg UK
13.2 L/100 km
17.8 mpg US
21.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
145 L
5.1 cu ft
Length
4,010 mm
157.9 in
Height
1,269 mm
50.0 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
265 L
9.4 cu ft
Length
4,470 mm
176.0 in
Height
1,296 mm
51.0 in
Range score
536 km
333 mi
606 km
377 mi
Trunk score
145 L
5.1 cu ft
265 L
9.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
249 hp/t
186 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
199 hp/t
148 kW/t
5.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12
Consumption11.2 L/100 km21 mpg US25.2 mpg UK13.2 L/100 km17.8 mpg US21.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.60 LC100 km23.10 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.54 LC100 mi37.18 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,680 L444 US gal370 UK gal1,980 L523 US gal436 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,940 LC/year3,465 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6

  • Is 560 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 2.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 50 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12

  • Has 40 hp more
  • Has 120 Nm more
  • Has 70 km (44 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 120 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) AMG SLK 32 V6
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

AMG SLK 32 V6
AMG SLK 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8
SL 600 V12
SL 600 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12vsMercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995SL 600 V12
AMG SLK 32 V6
AMG SLK 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R171)Facelift 2008AMG SLK 55 V8
SL 600 V12
AMG SL 43
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12vsMercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 43
AMG SLK 32 V6
SLK 350 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 350 V6
SL 600 V12
SL 400 V6
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12vsMercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6
AMG SLK 32 V6
SLK 230 Kompressor
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6vsMercedes-BenzSLK (R170)SLK 230 Kompressor
SL 600 V12
AMG SL 73 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12vsMercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1998AMG SL 73 V12
AMG SLK 32 V6
5.7 i V8 16V
VS
Mercedes-BenzSLK (R170)Facelift 2000AMG SLK 32 V6vsChevroletCorvette Convertible (C5)5.7 i V8 16V
SL 600 V12
AMG SL 55 V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12vsMercedes-BenzSL (R230)AMG SL 55 V8
SL 600 V12
500 SL V8
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12vsMercedes-BenzSL (R107)Facelift 1985500 SL V8
SL 600 V12
SL 600 V12
VS
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)SL 600 V12vsMercedes-BenzSL (R230)Facelift 2008SL 600 V12
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R170) · Facelift 2000 AMG SLK 32 V6 vs Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) SL 600 V12 - car comparison - FastVsFaster