Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8vsMercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995
AMG SL 60 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8
- Most powerful381 hp284 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption16.0 L/100 km14.7 mpg US17.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range696 km432 mi
- Largest trunk265 L
- Best economy score76/100
- Best practicality score31/100
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,465 kg3,230 lb
- Best power-to-weight246 hp/t183 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption8.8 L/100 km26.7 mpg US32.1 mpg UK
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360hp268kW | 381hp284kW |
| Torque | 510Nm376lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Gross weight | 1,850kg4,079lb | 2,230kg4,916lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 61.3s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.9s Calculated | 19.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17.7L/100 km13.3mpg US16.0mpg UK | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 246hp/t183kW/t111hp/1000 lb Calculated | 205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 348Nm/t233lb-ft/ton Calculated | 313Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 583km362mi Calculated | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 5,956cc363cu in |
| Length | 4,087mm161in | 4,499mm177in |
| Width | 1,794mm71in | 1,812mm71in |
| Height | 1,271mm50in | 1,296mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,515mm99in |
| Front track | 1,524mm60in | 1,532mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,549mm61in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 208L | 265L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 80L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 5,750 rpm | 4,000 rpm | 6,000 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.9 s | 19.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 182 km/h 113 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 360 hp 268 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 381 hp 284 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8 has 21 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8: 21 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 4.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 5.8 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8 and Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 583 km 362 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 696 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 360 hp 268 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R171)AMG SLK 55 V8 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp 268 kW | 381 hp 284 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 510 Nm 376 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 583 km 362 mi | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 208 L 7.3 cu ft | 265 L 9.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 246 hp/t 183 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8 | Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R171) AMG SLK 55 V8
- Is 390 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 40 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8
- Has 21 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 112 km (70 mi) more estimated range
- Has 57 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























