Car comparison

Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 63 V8vsMercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Mercedes-Benz SL (R232)

AMG SL 63 V8

585 hp3982 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedRoadster2021-present
VS

Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995

AMG SL 60 V8

381 hp5956 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedRoadster1996-1998

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 63 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    315 km/h
    196 mph
  • Most powerful
    585 hp
    436 kW
  • Highest torque
    800 Nm
    590 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    309 hp/t
    230 kW/t
    3.2 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    74/100
  • Best performance score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    39/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelMercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8
Power
585hp436kW
381hp284kW
Torque
800Nm590lb-ft
580Nm428lb-ft
Curb weight
1,895kg4,178lb
1,855kg4,090lb
Gross weight-
2,230kg4,916lb
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
55.9s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
80.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.6s
5.8s
0-200 km/h
10.5s
Calculated
19.7s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.4s
Calculated
5.5s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
12.7L/100 km18.5mpg US22.2mpg UK
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.3s
Calculated
13.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
309hp/t230kW/t140hp/1000 lb
Calculated
205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
422Nm/t282lb-ft/ton
Calculated
313Nm/t209lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
551km342mi
Calculated
696km432mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,982cc243cu in
5,956cc363cu in
Length
4,705mm185in
4,499mm177in
Width
1,915mm75in
1,812mm71in
Height
1,353mm53in
1,296mm51in
Wheelbase
2,700mm106in
2,515mm99in
Front track
1,660mm65in
1,532mm60in
Rear track
1,625mm64in
1,521mm60in
Trunk volume
213L
265L
Max trunk volume
240L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
2
Fuel tank
70L
80L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 63 V8Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8PowerTorque
  • Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 63 V8: Power / Torque
  • Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V85,500-6,500 rpm2,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V85,500 rpm3,750 rpm5,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricMercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.4 s
5.5 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.6 s
5.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.5 s
19.7 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
6.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.5 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.6 s
11.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.3 s
13.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
208 km/h
129 mph
170 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 63 V8 has 204 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 63 V8: 204 hp (152 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8
580 Nm
428 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8
1,895 kg
4,178 lb
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8
1,855 kg
4,090 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8
315 km/h
196 mph
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 63 V8 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8: 2.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 63 V8: 1.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8
309 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8
205 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8
585 hp
436 kW
3.6 s
315 km/h
196 mph
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8
381 hp
284 kW
5.8 s
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8
Power
585 hp
436 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
213 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
4,705 mm
185.2 in
Height
1,353 mm
53.3 in
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8
Power
381 hp
284 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
265 L
9.4 cu ft
Length
4,499 mm
177.1 in
Height
1,296 mm
51.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8
Power
585 hp
436 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8
Power
381 hp
284 kW
0-100 km/h5.8 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 63 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
3.6 s
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
5.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Mercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8
309 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8
205 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleMercedes-BenzSL (R232)AMG SL 63 V8Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8
Power
585 hp
436 kW
381 hp
284 kW
Torque
800 Nm
590 lb-ft
580 Nm
428 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.6 s
5.8 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Unrestricted
270 km/h168 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,895 kg
4,178 lb
1,855 kg
4,090 lb
Fuel consumption
12.7 L/100 km
18.5 mpg US
22.2 mpg UK
11.5 L/100 km
20.5 mpg US
24.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
213 L
7.5 cu ft
Length
4,705 mm
185.2 in
Height
1,353 mm
53.3 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
265 L
9.4 cu ft
Length
4,499 mm
177.1 in
Height
1,296 mm
51.0 in
Range score
551 km
342 mi
696 km
432 mi
Trunk score
213 L
7.5 cu ft
265 L
9.4 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
309 hp/t
230 kW/t
3.2 kg/hp
205 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleMercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 63 V8Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8
Consumption12.7 L/100 km18.5 mpg US22.2 mpg UK11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km22.22 LC100 km20.13 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi35.77 LC100 mi32.39 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,905 L503 US gal419 UK gal1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,334 LC/year3,019 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 63 V8

  • Has 204 hp more
  • Has 220 Nm more
  • Is 2.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 45 km/h (28 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 103 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8

  • Is 40 kg lighter
  • Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 144 km (90 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 52 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 63 V8
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) AMG SL 60 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Mercedes-Benz SL (R232) AMG SL 63 V8 vs Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster