Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) · Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6vsMercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SL (R129) · Facelift 1995
AMG SL 60 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed270 km/h168 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,660 kg3,660 lb
- Best power-to-weight221 hp/t165 kW/t4.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.0 L/100 km39.2 mpg US47.1 mpg UK
- Best estimated range844 km525 mi
- Largest trunk345 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score73/100
- Best economy score86/100
- Best practicality score34/100
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8
- Most powerful381 hp284 kW
- Highest torque580 Nm428 lb-ft
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367hp274kW | 381hp284kW |
| Torque | 500Nm369lb-ft | 580Nm428lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,660kg3,660lb | 1,855kg4,090lb |
| Gross weight | 2,115kg4,663lb | 2,230kg4,916lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 65.6s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated | 80.2s99% target: 267 km/h / 166 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 16.4s Calculated | 19.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 5.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK | 16L/100 km14.7mpg US17.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.0s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 221hp/t165kW/t100hp/1000 lb Calculated | 205hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 301Nm/t202lb-ft/ton Calculated | 313Nm/t209lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 844km525mi Calculated | 696km432mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,996cc183cu in | 5,956cc363cu in |
| Length | 4,631mm182in | 4,499mm177in |
| Width | 1,877mm74in | 1,812mm71in |
| Height | 1,315mm52in | 1,296mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,585mm102in | 2,515mm99in |
| Front track | 1,600mm63in | 1,532mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 345L | 265L |
| Max trunk volume | 485L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 80L |
| CO2 emissions | 175g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 2,000-4,200 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 5,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 5.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 16.4 s | 19.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.0 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 180 km/h 112 mph | 170 km/h 105 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 367 hp 274 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 381 hp 284 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8 has 14 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8: 14 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 4.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 5.8 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8: 0.9 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8: 3.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 844 km 525 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 696 km 432 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 367 hp 274 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 381 hp 284 kW | 5.8 s | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 |
| 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 |
| 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 4.9 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | 5.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSL (R231)Facelift 2016SL 400 V6 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R129)Facelift 1995AMG SL 60 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp 274 kW | 381 hp 284 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | 580 Nm 428 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 270 km/h168 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,660 kg 3,660 lb | 1,855 kg 4,090 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.7 L/100 km 30.5 mpg US 36.7 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km 20.5 mpg US 24.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 844 km 525 mi | 696 km 432 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 175 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 345 L 12.2 cu ft | 265 L 9.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 221 hp/t 165 kW/t 4.5 kg/hp | 205 hp/t 153 kW/t 4.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6 | Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK | 11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 13.48 LC100 km | 20.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 21.69 LC100 mi | 32.39 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal | 1,725 L456 US gal379 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,021 LC/year | 3,019 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SL (R231) Facelift 2016 SL 400 V6
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 3.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 149 km (92 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz SL (R129) Facelift 1995 AMG SL 60 V8
- Has 14 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























