Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250vsMercedes-Benz SL (R107) 500 SL V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz SL (R107)
500 SL V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.6 s
- Fastest top speed243 km/h151 mph
- Lightest1,425 kg3,142 lb
- Lowest city consumption8.7 L/100 km27.0 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Best overall score47/100
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score89/100
Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 500 SL V8
- Most powerful231 hp172 kW
- Highest torque404 Nm298 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight150 hp/t112 kW/t6.7 kg/hp
- Best practicality score32/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)500 SL V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 231hp172kW |
| Torque | 310Nm229lb-ft | 404Nm298lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,425kg3,142lb | 1,540kg3,395lb |
| Gross weight | 1,815kg4,001lb | 1,960kg4,321lb |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.9s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated | 95.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.6s | 8.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.0s Calculated | 32.3s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK | 15.6L/100 km15.1mpg US18.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.6s Calculated | 15.8s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 143hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 150hp/t112kW/t68hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 218Nm/t146lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t176lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 909km565mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 1,796cc110cu in | 4,973cc303cu in |
| Length | 4,134mm163in | 4,390mm173in |
| Width | 1,810mm71in | 1,790mm70in |
| Height | 1,303mm51in | 1,300mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,430mm96in | 2,455mm97in |
| Front track | 1,551mm61in | 1,452mm57in |
| Rear track | 1,568mm62in | 1,440mm57in |
| Trunk volume | 225L | - |
| Max trunk volume | 335L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 85L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 500 SL V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,300 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)500 SL V8 | 4,750 rpm | 3,000 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)500 SL V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.6 s | 8.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.0 s | 32.3 s |
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.3 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.6 s | 15.8 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 149 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)500 SL V8 | 231 hp 172 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 500 SL V8 has 27 hp more than Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 500 SL V8: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)500 SL V8 | 404 Nm 298 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)500 SL V8 | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)500 SL V8 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 6.6 s |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)500 SL V8 | 8.1 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 500 SL V8 has more power, Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 and Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 500 SL V8: 1.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)500 SL V8 | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | 204 hp 152 kW | 6.6 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)500 SL V8 | 231 hp 172 kW | 8.1 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)500 SL V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLK (R172)SLK 250 | Mercedes-BenzSL (R107)500 SL V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 231 hp 172 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 310 Nm 229 lb-ft | 404 Nm 298 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.6 s | 8.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 243 km/h 151 mph | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 220 km/h137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,425 kg 3,142 lb | 1,540 kg 3,395 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.6 L/100 km 35.6 mpg US 42.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 909 km 565 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 225 L 7.9 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 143 hp/t 107 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 150 hp/t 112 kW/t 6.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.6 L/100 km35.6 mpg US42.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.55 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.59 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 990 L262 US gal218 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,733 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLK (R172) SLK 250
- Is 115 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
Mercedes-Benz SL (R107) 500 SL V8
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 94 Nm more
- Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























